Path: csiph.com!news.mixmin.net!aioe.org!bofh.it!news.nic.it!robomod From: Paul Wise Newsgroups: linux.debian.maint.python Subject: Re: pyyaml 6 Date: Fri, 07 Oct 2022 03:50:01 +0200 Message-ID: References: X-Mailbox-Line: From debian-python-request@lists.debian.org Fri Oct 7 01:44:32 2022 Old-Return-Path: X-Amavis-Spam-Status: No, score=-116.636 tagged_above=-10000 required=5.3 tests=[BAYES_00=-2, DKIMWL_WL_HIGH=-0.083, DKIM_SIGNED=0.1, DKIM_VALID=-0.1, DKIM_VALID_AU=-0.1, DKIM_VALID_EF=-0.1, FVGT_m_MULTI_ODD=0.02, LDO_WHITELIST=-5, PGPSIGNATURE=-5, RCVD_IN_DNSWL_HI=-5, SARE_MSGID_LONG40=0.637, USER_IN_DKIM_WELCOMELIST=-0.01, USER_IN_DKIM_WHITELIST=-100] autolearn=ham autolearn_force=no Reply-To: debian-python@lists.debian.org Organization: Debian Content-Type: multipart/signed; micalg="pgp-sha512"; protocol="application/pgp-signature"; boundary="=-2ul3/YocBu2g41UqkDlw" MIME-Version: 1.0 User-Agent: Evolution 3.46.0-2 X-Mailing-List: archive/latest/20373 List-ID: List-URL: List-Archive: https://lists.debian.org/msgid-search/9cd7512cd7b316a145a234e1ecd2d1133cb614b4.camel@debian.org Approved: robomod@news.nic.it Lines: 67 Sender: robomod@news.nic.it X-Original-Date: Fri, 07 Oct 2022 09:43:59 +0800 X-Original-Message-ID: <9cd7512cd7b316a145a234e1ecd2d1133cb614b4.camel@debian.org> X-Original-References: Xref: csiph.com linux.debian.maint.python:14524 --=-2ul3/YocBu2g41UqkDlw Content-Type: text/plain; charset="UTF-8" Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable On Fri, 2022-10-07 at 00:10 +0200, Gordon Ball wrote: > * Upload to unstable and see what breaks? The experimental pseudo-excuses already say several packages break: https://qa.debian.org/excuses.php?experimental=3D1&package=3Dpyyaml =20 autopkgtest for ganeti/3.0.2-1: amd64: Regression, arm64: Regression autopkgtest for llvm-toolchain-13/1:13.0.1-7: amd64: Pass, arm64: Regres= sion autopkgtest for satpy/0.37.1-1: amd64: Regression, arm64: Regression autopkgtest for spades/3.15.5+dfsg-1: amd64: Regression So at least these issues need to be investigated and maybe bugs filed. > * Request an archive rebuild with this version and see what breaks? Definitely. > * File bugs against all likely affected packages with a fixed date for > an upload? Definitely. I don't know if any packages in Debian have versioned dependencies on pyyaml, but if they do then it might be worth filing a transition bug. Probably also a good idea to do that anyway too. https://wiki.debian.org/Teams/ReleaseTeam/Transitions There might also be Debian services broken by pyyaml 6, but they can be dealt with during the upgrade of the debian.org machines to bookworm. --=20 bye, pabs https://wiki.debian.org/PaulWise --=-2ul3/YocBu2g41UqkDlw Content-Type: application/pgp-signature; name="signature.asc" Content-Description: This is a digitally signed message part -----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE----- iQIzBAABCgAdFiEEYQsotVz8/kXqG1Y7MRa6Xp/6aaMFAmM/hF8ACgkQMRa6Xp/6 aaOxpBAAo+cDt6xE9zzatTZTuPgVw0W4XqYzFJzYEbMEBVDOTpt0j431Wl9RhBSe u3M8A7aIGTt5PMICAlIRsGqCSExA/LUkfnxnk8WPGSB2D9n3DodbmiXyiuAm24wK HQll+RIyyzuGhtEk0p5jMpY2kBIAOIi37QMHmDZazQOEragn1jUQn49gAs3UbO8M yl647kmp+zYVGg1L2OK4ah85Aap4jqXv9Lgl9er5bSVouHbR+xVajoDNEVwf9BSL KFWqgLbtUTvK+c+Sjb1Vrl57uZqBJbO9wWo0xoK3A1hUG4MQTt6xIhsNirbnljWE Z5y1tJBKGlYPoaLuZb/5qVCpqaSReabCsnhg1Wk44DC5HYtH62qOW8irgWvB1uZe +wp2p4E41QHh0Tzx0GTt3W0XfbQT9Z+IfUWHMhM2WUHUCTrd113FecWWz9gQdZl0 38CqAoQTY84LhUKkyU4HWGn4h1CGCyaOAc823jInL9fv1SxM9xDn3ctbA9XxyXIM fuZFfTjzWPV/PtNfad8YhhR5qfzzAgtzMzHhT2LmHw91hbQvOst5UTNBR3RBgBbc gf+aYH1JO8+RBqfCTs/trgTMqA19w4bGI1wKTspY7jMiF6/0SZKBcGGtioZm1WHj mVGiuFf/jOYyZ0js9rGXjPlhU3OsyFtpSjx8QCqMl32cHADXVBE= =Ex95 -----END PGP SIGNATURE----- --=-2ul3/YocBu2g41UqkDlw--