Path: csiph.com!tncsrv06.tnetconsulting.net!1.us.feeder.erje.net!2.eu.feeder.erje.net!feeder.erje.net!fu-berlin.de!bofh.it!news.nic.it!robomod From: Diane Trout Newsgroups: linux.debian.bugs.dist,linux.debian.maint.python Subject: Bug#1030096: Any ideas Re: #1030096 dask.distributed intermittent autopkgtest fail ? Date: Mon, 06 Feb 2023 20:40:01 +0100 Message-ID: References: X-Mailbox-Line: From debian-bugs-dist-request@lists.debian.org Mon Feb 6 19:39:12 2023 Old-Return-Path: X-Spam-Flag: NO X-Spam-Score: -3.75 Reply-To: Diane Trout , 1030096@bugs.debian.org Resent-To: debian-bugs-dist@lists.debian.org Resent-Cc: Debian Python Team X-Debian-Pr-Message: followup 1030096 X-Debian-Pr-Package: dask.distributed X-Debian-Pr-Source: dask.distributed Content-Type: text/plain; charset="UTF-8" Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable User-Agent: Evolution 3.46.3-1 MIME-Version: 1.0 X-Debian-Message: from BTS X-Mailing-List: archive/latest/1758605 List-ID: List-URL: Approved: robomod@news.nic.it Lines: 33 Organization: linux.* mail to news gateway Sender: robomod@news.nic.it X-Original-Cc: 1030096@bugs.debian.org, debian-python@lists.debian.org X-Original-Date: Mon, 06 Feb 2023 11:38:23 -0800 X-Original-Message-ID: X-Original-References: <501750bb-274c-6bba-7e04-594458aea097@zoho.com> <46ffe341-69af-90e0-3431-9cab6ecd391b@debian.org> Xref: csiph.com linux.debian.bugs.dist:1136697 linux.debian.maint.python:14903 On Mon, 2023-02-06 at 11:13 +0100, Andreas Tille wrote: > Hi Rebecca, >=20 > Am Mon, Feb 06, 2023 at 07:59:17AM +0000 schrieb Rebecca N. Palmer: > > (Background: the pandas + dask transition broke dask.distributed > > and it was > > hence removed from testing; I didn't notice at the time that if we > > don't get > > it back in we lose Spyder.) >=20 > as far as I know Diane has put quite some effort into dask and I > understood that dask and dask.distributed are closely interconnected. > =C2=A0 Hi now. My fragments of time were spent fighting with numba, and I didn't have the energy to be thinking about dask.distributed. Numba should be in a better place right now. So I can set my build machine to trying to build it and seeing where we are with it right now. The most important thing about dask / dask.distributed is they really should be at about the same upstream version. I'm not 100% sure how to mark that in the d/control file. Also upstream might have some ability to do minor releases independently. But if we do a new upstream release of dask, it needs to be paired with a new upstream release of dask.distributed. And in my experience dask.distributed is the one that's harder to get to work right. Diane