Path: csiph.com!1.us.feeder.erje.net!3.eu.feeder.erje.net!feeder.erje.net!news2.arglkargh.de!news.mixmin.net!aioe.org!bofh.it!news.nic.it!robomod From: Julian Gilbey Newsgroups: linux.debian.maint.python Subject: Re: Python 3.11 for bookworm? Date: Mon, 19 Dec 2022 21:30:01 +0100 Message-ID: References: X-Mailbox-Line: From debian-python-request@lists.debian.org Mon Dec 19 20:28:14 2022 Old-Return-Path: X-Amavis-Spam-Status: No, score=-7.18 tagged_above=-10000 required=5.3 tests=[BAYES_00=-2, DKIM_SIGNED=0.1, DKIM_VALID=-0.1, DKIM_VALID_AU=-0.1, DKIM_VALID_EF=-0.1, LDO_WHITELIST=-5, MURPHY_DRUGS_REL8=0.02] autolearn=ham autolearn_force=no X-Policyd-Weight: using cached result; rate: -4.6 MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline X-Mailing-List: archive/latest/20622 List-ID: List-URL: List-Archive: https://lists.debian.org/msgid-search/Y6DJSU70boJ/hbTf@d-and-j.net Approved: robomod@news.nic.it Lines: 33 Organization: linux.* mail to news gateway Sender: robomod@news.nic.it X-Original-Cc: Thomas Goirand , Debian Python , Graham Inggs X-Original-Date: Mon, 19 Dec 2022 20:27:53 +0000 X-Original-Message-ID: X-Original-References: Xref: csiph.com linux.debian.maint.python:14755 Hi Jochen, On Mon, Dec 19, 2022 at 04:53:58PM +0100, Jochen Sprickerhof wrote: > Hi Julian, > > * Julian Gilbey [2022-12-19 09:41]: > > Quick update: with the updating of python3-bytecode from 0.13 to 0.14 > > in unstable/testing, which allows it to handle Python 3.11, something > > has changed and now pydevd doesn't even pass the tests on Python > > 3.10. The python3-bytecode underwent a major restructuring, so it is > > entirely possible that something has changed that wasn't part of the > > advertised API or something like that. But that's for upstream pydevd > > developers to deal with. > > I've uploaded 0.14.0-2 that should fix this. As far as I've found that was > only a minor fix in the Debian specific offset patch, sorry for the trouble. Phew! I didn't think to check that. Unfortunately, though, there are still numerous pydevd test errors even with 0.14.0-2, so I think something has changed in bytecode that the pydevd maintainers will have to adapt to. So either I skip 14 newly failing tests on Python 3.10 (they're mostly skipped on 3.11 as the current pydevd version skips bytecode tests on Python 3.11) or wait for a new version of pydevd. Hmmm. Anyway, thanks so much for all your work updating this package - it's been really helpful, as I've been a bit overloaded and Spyder 5.4.0 together with the Python 3.11 transition has been a lot to handle. I also learnt a lot from your changes! Best wishes, Julian