Path: csiph.com!1.us.feeder.erje.net!2.eu.feeder.erje.net!feeder.erje.net!news2.arglkargh.de!news.mixmin.net!aioe.org!bofh.it!news.nic.it!robomod From: Julian Gilbey Newsgroups: linux.debian.maint.python Subject: Re: Updating pytest Date: Tue, 07 Jun 2022 00:40:01 +0200 Message-ID: References: X-Mailbox-Line: From debian-python-request@lists.debian.org Mon Jun 6 22:30:20 2022 Old-Return-Path: X-Amavis-Spam-Status: No, score=-7.21 tagged_above=-10000 required=5.3 tests=[BAYES_00=-2, DKIM_SIGNED=0.1, DKIM_VALID=-0.1, DKIM_VALID_AU=-0.1, DKIM_VALID_EF=-0.1, LDO_WHITELIST=-5, T_SCC_BODY_TEXT_LINE=-0.01] autolearn=ham autolearn_force=no X-Policyd-Weight: using cached result; rate: -4.6 MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=iso-8859-1 Content-Disposition: inline Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit X-Mailing-List: archive/latest/19963 List-ID: List-URL: List-Archive: https://lists.debian.org/msgid-search/Yp5/7JbmGL47gVDd@d-and-j.net Approved: robomod@news.nic.it Lines: 24 Organization: linux.* mail to news gateway Sender: robomod@news.nic.it X-Original-Cc: debian-python@lists.debian.org X-Original-Date: Mon, 6 Jun 2022 23:30:04 +0100 X-Original-Message-ID: X-Original-References: <67901ea5dde4c2e29b186562ff5bd807f06208a8.camel@debian.org> Xref: csiph.com linux.debian.maint.python:14135 On Sat, Jun 04, 2022 at 10:29:53AM +0800, Paul Wise wrote: > On Fri, 2022-06-03 at 19:08 +0100, Julian Gilbey wrote: > > > I believe that ci.debian.net checks packages against packages in > > experimental (see > > https://ci.debian.net/packages/s/spyder/unstable/amd64/ for example), > > so it may be that the work is already done for us; what I don't know, > > though, is how to extract this information for the package in > > experimental.  Perhaps worth asking the debian-ci people. > > I think this page includes debci results for experimental: > > https://release.debian.org/britney/pseudo-excuses-experimental.html > > It shows what would happen when migrating experimental to unstable. Oh wow, thanks! That's perfect. So we can upload the new pytest to experimental and see what happens... Anyone willing to go for it? Best wishes, Julian