Path: csiph.com!1.us.feeder.erje.net!3.us.feeder.erje.net!3.eu.feeder.erje.net!feeder.erje.net!weretis.net!feeder8.news.weretis.net!news.mixmin.net!aioe.org!bofh.it!news.nic.it!robomod
From: Julian Gilbey <julian@d-and-j.net>
Newsgroups: linux.debian.maint.python
Subject: Re: Updating pytest
Date: Fri, 03 Jun 2022 20:10:01 +0200
Message-ID: <EujUd-2kpz-11@gated-at.bofh.it>
References: <EtROj-21Vs-97@gated-at.bofh.it> <EtRXX-21YE-9@gated-at.bofh.it> <EtTZL-23gG-1@gated-at.bofh.it> <EtUVQ-23PV-5@gated-at.bofh.it>
X-Mailbox-Line: From debian-python-request@lists.debian.org  Fri Jun  3 18:08:31 2022
Old-Return-Path: <julian@d-and-j.net>
X-Amavis-Spam-Status: No, score=-6.21 tagged_above=-10000 required=5.3 tests=[BAYES_00=-2, DKIM_SIGNED=0.1, DKIM_VALID=-0.1, DKIM_VALID_AU=-0.1, DKIM_VALID_EF=-0.1, GMAIL=1, LDO_WHITELIST=-5, T_SCC_BODY_TEXT_LINE=-0.01] autolearn=ham autolearn_force=no
X-Policyd-Weight: using cached result; rate: -4.6
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=iso-8859-1
Content-Disposition: inline
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit
X-Mailing-List: <debian-python@lists.debian.org> archive/latest/19960
List-ID: <debian-python.lists.debian.org>
List-URL: <https://lists.debian.org/debian-python/>
List-Archive: https://lists.debian.org/msgid-search/YppOD+jceMgIkQWy@d-and-j.net
Approved: robomod@news.nic.it
Lines: 23
Organization: linux.* mail to news gateway
Sender: robomod@news.nic.it
X-Original-Cc: debian-python <debian-python@lists.debian.org>
X-Original-Date: Fri, 3 Jun 2022 19:08:15 +0100
X-Original-Message-ID: <YppOD+jceMgIkQWy@d-and-j.net>
X-Original-References: <YpiBoybEQMBuRVbW@d-and-j.net> <d9bd7cf6-f5c9-5c93-c796-9112ce1cc625@debian.org> <CAB4XWXz0VhaumnpjCV-Va0tD+z-odHX7XBffYxKR0z5Ljx2DOw@mail.gmail.com> <bfbd06e42d901651d8603d67423f215a42989c1a.camel@gmail.com>
Xref: csiph.com linux.debian.maint.python:14132

On Thu, Jun 02, 2022 at 05:28:36PM +0200, julien.puydt@gmail.com wrote:
> Le jeudi 02 juin 2022 à 10:28 -0400, Sandro Tosi a écrit :
> > > I would suggest ratt-rebuilding all reverse dependencies. Could
> > > that be
> > > done?
> > 
> > there order of thousands rdeps, i dont think it's fair to ask any
> > individual contributor the time and resources to check that via ratt.
> 
> Agreed. If the list of packages to check can't be handled by my modest
> setup during the night, I won't check them all.
> [...]

I believe that ci.debian.net checks packages against packages in
experimental (see
https://ci.debian.net/packages/s/spyder/unstable/amd64/ for example),
so it may be that the work is already done for us; what I don't know,
though, is how to extract this information for the package in
experimental.  Perhaps worth asking the debian-ci people.

Best wishes,

   Julian