Path: csiph.com!1.us.feeder.erje.net!3.us.feeder.erje.net!3.eu.feeder.erje.net!feeder.erje.net!feeds.phibee-telecom.net!news.mixmin.net!aioe.org!bofh.it!news.nic.it!robomod From: julien.puydt@gmail.com Newsgroups: linux.debian.maint.python Subject: Re: Updating pytest Date: Thu, 02 Jun 2022 17:30:02 +0200 Message-ID: References: X-Mailbox-Line: From debian-python-request@lists.debian.org Thu Jun 2 15:28:54 2022 Old-Return-Path: X-Amavis-Spam-Status: No, score=-6.572 tagged_above=-10000 required=5.3 tests=[BAYES_00=-2, DKIM_SIGNED=0.1, DKIM_VALID=-0.1, DKIM_VALID_AU=-0.1, DKIM_VALID_EF=-0.1, FREEMAIL_FROM=0.001, LDO_WHITELIST=-5, RCVD_IN_DNSWL_NONE=-0.0001, SARE_MSGID_LONG40=0.637, T_SCC_BODY_TEXT_LINE=-0.01] autolearn=ham autolearn_force=no X-Policyd-Weight: using cached result; rate: -5.5 X-Gm-Message-State: AOAM532bDVs2blxGuFfth4Lsm9siM41fRl857TGc2YGFGGyKjT/7RKZQ cOxkkfHmViAgZzHX3nlbWYbi7CSyFFY= X-Google-SMTP-Source: ABdhPJw/w5TeppwZsQR0LbU5KHYJlR/fIPfCT8f4fKaN2m0O63fd0dd0Pn/NQ7fW2fVW+nDo6Da2Zw== X-Received: by 2002:a05:600c:1c17:b0:397:62ec:8f9c with SMTP id j23-20020a05600c1c1700b0039762ec8f9cmr4539543wms.69.1654183718505; Thu, 02 Jun 2022 08:28:38 -0700 (PDT) Content-Type: text/plain; charset="UTF-8" Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable User-Agent: Evolution 3.44.2-1 MIME-Version: 1.0 X-Mailing-List: archive/latest/19956 List-ID: List-URL: List-Archive: https://lists.debian.org/msgid-search/bfbd06e42d901651d8603d67423f215a42989c1a.camel@gmail.com Approved: robomod@news.nic.it Lines: 29 Organization: linux.* mail to news gateway Sender: robomod@news.nic.it X-Original-Date: Thu, 02 Jun 2022 17:28:36 +0200 X-Original-Message-ID: X-Original-References: Xref: csiph.com linux.debian.maint.python:14128 Le jeudi 02 juin 2022 =C3=A0 10:28 -0400, Sandro Tosi a =C3=A9crit=C2=A0: > > I would suggest ratt-rebuilding all reverse dependencies. Could > > that be > > done? >=20 > there order of thousands rdeps, i dont think it's fair to ask any > individual contributor the time and resources to check that via ratt. Agreed. If the list of packages to check can't be handled by my modest setup during the night, I won't check them all. > Something i've done in the past (f.e. with numpy and matplotlib) is > leveraging Lucas' archive rebuild infrastructure to run a rebuild the > rdeps with a new package, usually uploaded in experimental. When I upgrade a package with a number of rdeps I deem unreasonable for my setup, I pick some rdeps semi-randomly (mostly random, but having a look at the list to hand-pick a few promising ones, or make sure I drop problematic ones [sagemath comes to mind]). That won't guarantee nothing will break, but does detect glaring issues. And indeed, uploading to experimental and giving people a head's up if there's a thousand rdeps and you can only test 1% is important. Cheers, J.Puydt