Path: csiph.com!newsfeed.xs4all.nl!newsfeed8.news.xs4all.nl!bofh.it!news.nic.it!robomod From: Julian Gilbey Newsgroups: linux.debian.maint.python Subject: Re: Messed up a salsa commit - how best to fix? Date: Sun, 24 Apr 2022 23:20:02 +0200 Message-ID: References: X-Original-To: debian-python@lists.debian.org X-Mailbox-Line: From debian-python-request@lists.debian.org Sun Apr 24 21:13:02 2022 Old-Return-Path: X-Amavis-Spam-Status: No, score=-7.21 tagged_above=-10000 required=5.3 tests=[BAYES_00=-2, DIGITS_LETTERS=1, DKIM_SIGNED=0.1, DKIM_VALID=-0.1, DKIM_VALID_AU=-0.1, DKIM_VALID_EF=-0.1, LDO_WHITELIST=-5, MD5_SHA1_SUM=-1, T_SCC_BODY_TEXT_LINE=-0.01] autolearn=ham autolearn_force=no X-Policyd-Weight: using cached result; rate: -4.6 MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=iso-8859-1 Content-Disposition: inline Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit X-Mailing-List: archive/latest/19900 List-ID: List-URL: List-Archive: https://lists.debian.org/msgid-search/YmW9T+ysYUqKPOZG@d-and-j.net Approved: robomod@news.nic.it Lines: 18 Organization: linux.* mail to news gateway Sender: robomod@news.nic.it X-Original-Date: Sun, 24 Apr 2022 22:12:47 +0100 X-Original-Message-ID: X-Original-References: <20220424204251.u7kqa2cd7xf2sabw@mail.gaussglocke.de> <20220424204955.l3ng5oxr5cb5ts5n@mail.gaussglocke.de> Xref: csiph.com linux.debian.maint.python:14075 On Sun, Apr 24, 2022 at 10:49:55PM +0200, Timo Röhling wrote: > * Timo Röhling [2022-04-24 22:42]: > > Make sure that your local upstream branch and the upstream/5.3.0 tag > > both point at commit 08935221b549bf32157d739cd54eb1645a2ab123: > Aaaand I copied the wrong commit hash to the email. :/ > e228e8902aeb91011a53bb1a91f7f3390a771e0e is the one you should be > looking for: > > https://salsa.debian.org/python-team/packages/python-qtconsole/-/commit/e228e8902aeb91011a53bb1a91f7f3390a771e0e Indeed, that was the commit made by gbp import-orig. But the upstream and pristine-tar branches don't include that commit, unfortunately, because of my mistake. Therefore gbp buildpackage doesn't work, because it can't find the original sources on the upstream branch. Best wishes, Julian