Path: csiph.com!1.us.feeder.erje.net!feeder.erje.net!news.uzoreto.com!aioe.org!bofh.it!news.nic.it!robomod From: =?UTF-8?Q?Louis-Philippe_V=c3=a9ronneau?= Newsgroups: linux.debian.maint.python Subject: Re: pdm-pep517: Shall we package it now? Date: Fri, 08 Jul 2022 08:00:01 +0200 Message-ID: References: X-Mailbox-Line: From debian-python-request@lists.debian.org Fri Jul 8 05:50:52 2022 Old-Return-Path: X-Amavis-Spam-Status: No, score=-6.19 tagged_above=-10000 required=5.3 tests=[BAYES_00=-2, BODY_8BITS=1.5, LDO_WHITELIST=-5, MURPHY_DRUGS_REL8=0.02, RCVD_IN_DNSWL_LOW=-0.7, T_SCC_BODY_TEXT_LINE=-0.01] autolearn=ham autolearn_force=no X-Policyd-Weight: using cached result; rate: -3.5 X-Greylist: delayed 130266 seconds by postgrey-1.36 at bendel; Fri, 08 Jul 2022 05:50:39 UTC X-Riseup-User-ID: 65F3AE0DB37265CEAA0FE7B645FAA71C8FF5EFBAB2CF14C6C6C9C41CA2D174F7 MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Language: en-US Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit X-Mailing-List: archive/latest/20058 List-ID: List-URL: List-Archive: https://lists.debian.org/msgid-search/153286ba-5f7a-27fa-14ac-08507c82e585@debian.org Approved: robomod@news.nic.it Lines: 44 Organization: linux.* mail to news gateway Sender: robomod@news.nic.it X-Original-Date: Fri, 8 Jul 2022 07:50:31 +0200 X-Original-Message-ID: <153286ba-5f7a-27fa-14ac-08507c82e585@debian.org> X-Original-References: <758d24dbf569e25a1cb40318168e54a959d93619.camel@debian.org> <4b5b0743-568c-83c0-68b7-72874b8f3cb1@debian.org> <17ec1b326da557e7eb479d56d7a1b6e3172c0cc3.camel@debian.org> Xref: csiph.com linux.debian.maint.python:14226 On 2022-07-07 15 h 36, Boyuan Yang wrote: > Hi, > > 在 2022-06-28星期二的 11:19 -0400，Louis-Philippe Véronneau写道： >> On 2022-06-28 09 h 24, Boyuan Yang wrote: >>> Hi all, >>> >>> I have encountered more and more packages that uses pdm-pep517 as build >>> backend. Looking at [1], existing packages in Debian added patches to >>> manually switch to other backends, such as Poetry. >>> >>> I am wondering if it's time to package pdm-pep517 itself [2], or is >>> there >>> any blocking for it. I am aware that some sort of bootstrapping might be >>> needed since pdm-pep517 seems to build-depends on itself. Besides that, >>> what >>> about packaging of pdm? Please correct me if needed: my mind and my >>> packaging work is still stuck in the old times of setup.py, and I just >>> started to look into the new ecosystem of pep517. Thanks! >>> >>> Regards, >>> Boyuan Yang >>> >>> >>> [1] https://codesearch.debian.net/search?q=pdm.pep517 >>> [2] https://github.com/pdm-project/pdm-pep517 >> >> Once packaged, please ping me so I can update the >> "missing-prerequisite-for-pyproject-backend" Lintian tag accordingly and >> let people know they can migrate to it. > > This is now accepted at https://tracker.debian.org/pkg/pdm-pep517 . Thanks for the work on this. Here's the lintian MR for reference: https://salsa.debian.org/lintian/lintian/-/merge_requests/400 -- ⢀⣴⠾⠻⢶⣦⠀ ⣾⠁⢠⠒⠀⣿⡁ Louis-Philippe Véronneau ⢿⡄⠘⠷⠚⠋ pollo@debian.org / veronneau.org ⠈⠳⣄