Path: csiph.com!newsfeed.xs4all.nl!newsfeed8.news.xs4all.nl!bofh.it!news.nic.it!robomod From: Stefano Rivera Newsgroups: linux.debian.maint.python Subject: Re: DPT repositories checks/"violations" report Date: Sat, 27 Nov 2021 15:00:01 +0100 Message-ID: References: X-Mailbox-Line: From debian-python-request@lists.debian.org Sat Nov 27 13:55:13 2021 Old-Return-Path: X-Amavis-Spam-Status: No, score=-6.9 tagged_above=-10000 required=5.3 tests=[BAYES_00=-2, DKIMWL_WL_HIGH=-0.049, DKIM_SIGNED=0.1, DKIM_VALID=-0.1, DKIM_VALID_AU=-0.1, HEADER_FROM_DIFFERENT_DOMAINS=0.249, LDO_WHITELIST=-5] autolearn=ham autolearn_force=no X-Policyd-Weight: using cached result; rate: -4.6 Mail-Followup-To: debian-python@lists.debian.org X-Gpg-Public-Key: http://www.rivera.za.net/stefano.gpg MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8 Content-Disposition: inline User-Agent: NeoMutt/20201127 X-Mailing-List: archive/latest/19538 List-ID: List-URL: List-Archive: https://lists.debian.org/msgid-search/20211127135456.dt6wwgl42bzqoywg@satie.tumbleweed.org.za Approved: robomod@news.nic.it Lines: 38 Organization: linux.* mail to news gateway Sender: robomod@news.nic.it X-Original-Date: Sat, 27 Nov 2021 13:54:56 +0000 X-Original-Message-ID: <20211127135456.dt6wwgl42bzqoywg@satie.tumbleweed.org.za> X-Original-References: Xref: csiph.com linux.debian.maint.python:13735 Hi Sandro (2021.11.27_06:01:08_+0000) > Hello, > while working on something else[1], i noticed how many of the > repositories in the DPT salsa group are in poor shape: > > * missing branches > * changes not pushed to salsa > * general misalignment in configuration/setup/organization > * many other small nuances > > [1] https://github.com/sandrotosi/debian-python-team-tracker +1 this is great! I've been doing some 3.10 NMUs recently, and found myself re-creating several upstream and pristine-tar branches... > please take the content with caution, as it's still an early, raw > draft (i spot-checked some of the reported issues, but there could be > bugs/issues) and it contains data that can be outdated (see below re > caching); the fact that the report indicates only 43 repos are without > violations is a bit disarming, but i think the tool tries to err on > the side of verbosity and pedantry, with 2 level of violations (ERROR > and WARNING) to mark which ones are the most important that require > immediate attention vs the nice-to-have ones. When we did the migration to git, there weren't good tools for managing the setup of the salsa repos (hooks, etc.) yet. I'd assume those exist now, we should check in with what other teams are doing. That stuff can all be fixed in one run of a tool, I'd assume. SR -- Stefano Rivera http://tumbleweed.org.za/ +1 415 683 3272