Path: csiph.com!newsfeed.xs4all.nl!newsfeed9.news.xs4all.nl!bofh.it!news.nic.it!robomod From: Thomas Goirand Newsgroups: linux.debian.maint.python Subject: Re: mass bug filling for nose removal (was: Bug#997758: nose: FTBFS: There is a syntax error in your configuration file: invalid syntax (conf.py, line 220)) Date: Thu, 11 Nov 2021 18:00:01 +0100 Message-ID: References: X-Mailbox-Line: From debian-python-request@lists.debian.org Thu Nov 11 16:57:04 2021 Old-Return-Path: X-Amavis-Spam-Status: No, score=-7.001 tagged_above=-10000 required=5.3 tests=[BAYES_00=-2, LDO_WHITELIST=-5, NICE_REPLY_A=-0.001] autolearn=ham autolearn_force=no X-Policyd-Weight: using cached result; rate: -3.5 Organization: Debian User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (X11; Linux x86_64; rv:78.0) Gecko/20100101 Thunderbird/78.14.0 MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=windows-1252 Content-Language: en-US Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-Mailing-List: archive/latest/19496 List-ID: List-URL: List-Archive: https://lists.debian.org/msgid-search/ae331679-6bff-b311-19da-2b9cca92c939@debian.org Approved: robomod@news.nic.it Lines: 32 Sender: robomod@news.nic.it X-Original-Date: Thu, 11 Nov 2021 17:56:47 +0100 X-Original-Message-ID: X-Original-References: <9052bf2e-8aba-dd35-590e-c539405848b4@debian.org> Xref: csiph.com linux.debian.maint.python:13693 On 11/11/21 1:33 PM, Dmitry Shachnev wrote: > Hi Thomas! > > On Thu, Nov 11, 2021 at 11:04:10AM +0100, Thomas Goirand wrote: >> On 10/24/21 3:24 PM, Dmitry Shachnev wrote: >>> If anyone is still using nose (1.x), please port your packages to nose2, >>> pure unittest or pytest. I am attaching a dd-list and I intend to do a MBF >>> in a few weeks when I have more time. >>> >>> -- >>> Dmitry Shachnev >> >> Hi, >> >> I wonder if we could do a mass bug filling for this. Your thoughts? > > Yes, this idea was present in my original mail you quoted here :) > > I intend to do it at some point, but I can't yet say when it will happen. Yes, but your original idea was to kick nose out of Debian before we get the chance to fix. I believe it'd be nicer to do the MBF even if we keep nose for a while, which is why I wrote about it again, as I didn't know what your intention was. Very good if you still have it in mind then! It'd be very useful to me at least (as many of the package I contribute may be affected and it's hard to have a vision of it without the MBF). Cheers, Thomas Goirand (zigo)