Path: csiph.com!newsfeed.xs4all.nl!newsfeed9.news.xs4all.nl!bofh.it!news.nic.it!robomod From: Ondrej Novy Newsgroups: linux.debian.maint.python Subject: Re: Why is isal limited to just three archs? Date: Thu, 28 Oct 2021 19:20:02 +0200 Message-ID: References: X-Original-To: Nilesh Patra X-Mailbox-Line: From debian-python-request@lists.debian.org Thu Oct 28 17:12:20 2021 Old-Return-Path: X-Amavis-Spam-Status: No, score=-2.5 tagged_above=-10000 required=5.3 tests=[BAYES_00=-2, DKIM_SIGNED=0.1, DKIM_VALID=-0.1, FREEMAIL_FORGED_FROMDOMAIN=0.25, FREEMAIL_FROM=0.001, HEADER_FROM_DIFFERENT_DOMAINS=0.249, HTML_MESSAGE=2, LDO_WHITELIST=-5, MEDS2=2, RCVD_IN_DNSWL_NONE=-0.0001] autolearn=no autolearn_force=no X-Policyd-Weight: using cached result; rate: -5.5 X-Gm-Message-State: AOAM532dyI8PTfHQvJzXlfvBb8mDj/2gJgUo7tYhiOQ/4NDvey9nzK2M xUlTxlvJtqy0sUfet+X26zIzKC1ZFhEP/UhXnljc6R3R X-Google-SMTP-Source: ABdhPJwZ54zH5O1F/NDqpXbBdsfFBneWZbp6rfsw1JnsvMVIu4EGZwArED9V6LXptxupogNMgRUCxw+WbrqId+fhA/E= X-Received: by 2002:a5d:47cd:: with SMTP id o13mr7371440wrc.85.1635440196561; Thu, 28 Oct 2021 09:56:36 -0700 (PDT) MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: multipart/alternative; boundary="000000000000f7ada805cf6c97a5" X-Mailing-List: archive/latest/19464 List-ID: List-URL: List-Archive: https://lists.debian.org/msgid-search/CAOO6c=zJ+M0g1ac36G_7+DwjwKvXTxdVHBaCx-10F+Aiypp8Sw@mail.gmail.com Approved: robomod@news.nic.it Lines: 64 Organization: linux.* mail to news gateway Sender: robomod@news.nic.it X-Original-Cc: debian-python , Thomas Goirand , =?UTF-8?B?T25kxZllaiBOb3bDvQ==?= X-Original-Date: Thu, 28 Oct 2021 18:56:25 +0200 X-Original-Message-ID: X-Original-References: <00c0ac0e-659e-e072-42e7-46ebc3587413@nileshpatra.info> Xref: csiph.com linux.debian.maint.python:13664 --000000000000f7ada805cf6c97a5 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="UTF-8" Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable Hi Nilesh, so 16. 10. 2021 v 9:09 odes=C3=ADlatel Nilesh Patra napsal: > I see that isal package is limited to amd64, arm64 and kfreebsd-amd64. > Is there a particular reason for this? -- Is it possible to extend suppor= t > to other archs? > When I packed libisal, only "customer" was liberasurecode. Liberasurecode supports many backends and supports all archs. And because libisal is highly optimized for ARM and amd64, I built it only for these archs. Other platforms are supported, but not optimized. liberasurecode directly should perform better. Actually, a -med team package fastp has started to depend on libisal-dev And because there is other "customer", I will try to build it for all archs. Thanks. --=20 Best regards Ond=C5=99ej Nov=C3=BD --000000000000f7ada805cf6c97a5 Content-Type: text/html; charset="UTF-8" Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable
Hi Nilesh,

so 16. 10. 2021 v=C2=A09:09 odes=C3=ADlatel= Nilesh Patra <nilesh@nileshp= atra.info> napsal:
I see that isal package is limited to amd64, arm64 and kfreebsd-amd64.
Is there a particular reason for this? -- Is it possible to extend support = to other archs?

When I packed libisal, = only "customer" was liberasurecode. Liberasurecode supports many = backends and supports all archs. And because libisal is highly optimized fo= r ARM and amd64, I built it only for these archs. Other platforms are suppo= rted, but not optimized. liberasurecode directly should perform better.

Actually, a -med team package fastp has started to depend on libisal-dev

And because there is other "customer&quo= t;, I will try to build it for all archs.=C2=A0

Th= anks.

--
Best regards
=C2=A0Ond=C5=99ej Nov=C3=BD

--000000000000f7ada805cf6c97a5--