Path: csiph.com!newsfeed.xs4all.nl!newsfeed7.news.xs4all.nl!bofh.it!news.nic.it!robomod From: Andreas Tille Newsgroups: linux.debian.bugs.dist,linux.debian.maint.python Subject: Bug#1005459: rdflib: FTBFS: dh_auto_test: error: pybuild --test --test-nose -i python{version} -p "3.10 3.9" returned exit code 13 Date: Thu, 24 Feb 2022 13:50:01 +0100 Message-ID: References: X-Original-To: Nilesh Patra X-Mailbox-Line: From debian-bugs-dist-request@lists.debian.org Thu Feb 24 12:42:09 2022 Old-Return-Path: X-Spam-Flag: NO X-Spam-Score: -6.662 Reply-To: Andreas Tille , 1005459@bugs.debian.org Resent-To: debian-bugs-dist@lists.debian.org Resent-Cc: Debian Python Team X-Debian-Pr-Message: followup 1005459 X-Debian-Pr-Package: src:rdflib X-Debian-Pr-Keywords: help confirmed ftbfs X-Debian-Pr-Source: rdflib MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline X-Debian-Message: from BTS X-Mailing-List: archive/latest/1706573 List-ID: List-URL: Approved: robomod@news.nic.it Lines: 38 Organization: linux.* mail to news gateway Sender: robomod@news.nic.it X-Original-Cc: 1005459@bugs.debian.org, 1005463@bugs.debian.org, Debian Python , Jonas Smedegaard , 995675@bugs.debian.org X-Original-Date: Thu, 24 Feb 2022 13:40:51 +0100 X-Original-Message-ID: X-Original-References: <939d0018-9cf4-c91f-4a05-4421067de844@tchncs.de> <939d0018-9cf4-c91f-4a05-4421067de844@tchncs.de> Xref: csiph.com linux.debian.bugs.dist:1094451 linux.debian.maint.python:13972 Hi Nilesh, Am Thu, Feb 24, 2022 at 06:00:03PM +0530 schrieb Nilesh Patra: > On 2/24/22 3:36 PM, Andreas Tille wrote: > > I tried to follow your suggestion to upgrade rdflib to version 6 in Git. > > Unfortunately I'm stumbling upon a different issue in the new test > > suite[1]. > > One really odd thing I noticed is that there is no dh_auto_build is overridden but not triggered inside it again, > and so dh_auto_build happening at all. > So I enabled this, which got the tests running. > Next there were some tests that need internet access or trying to open tcp ports, so I disabled them; > after which the package is building. > > I am simply running these tests also as autopkgtest with "needs-internet" restriction which should be a good > enough scrutiny. > > All changes in salsa. But please kindly check this properly before you do a dput. Sorry for dragging you into this - the experimental branch was way advanced which I learned in bug #995675. This leaves the question how we can proceed. It makes probably sense to run ratt or something like this to learn about packages that are broken. Unfortunately I did never got ratt working (since I failed to setup sbuild properly). On the other hand in the current situation with two open RC bugs all other packages are broken anyway and will be removed from testing if we do not act upon the issue. So may be we should upload to unstable? What do you think? Kind regards Andreas. -- http://fam-tille.de