Path: csiph.com!newsfeed.xs4all.nl!newsfeed9.news.xs4all.nl!bofh.it!news.nic.it!robomod
From: Julian Gilbey <julian@d-and-j.net>
Newsgroups: linux.debian.maint.python
Subject: Re: Bug#1005043: lintian: check that Python version numbers are not  0.0.0
Date: Tue, 08 Feb 2022 08:00:01 +0100
Message-ID: <DOsDL-lie-3@gated-at.bofh.it>
References: <DNAtH-Xe-1@gated-at.bofh.it> <DNB6p-1ay-1@gated-at.bofh.it> <DNOQ1-1ha-3@gated-at.bofh.it> <DNT3j-3JU-1@gated-at.bofh.it> <DO5Hb-79a-1@gated-at.bofh.it> <DOmyl-hh6-1@gated-at.bofh.it>
X-Original-To: debian-python@lists.debian.org
X-Mailbox-Line: From debian-python-request@lists.debian.org  Tue Feb  8 06:57:27 2022
Old-Return-Path: <julian@d-and-j.net>
X-Amavis-Spam-Status: No, score=-5.407 tagged_above=-10000 required=5.3 tests=[BAYES_00=-2, DKIM_SIGNED=0.1, DKIM_VALID=-0.1, DKIM_VALID_AU=-0.1, DKIM_VALID_EF=-0.1, LDO_WHITELIST=-5, RDNS_NONE=0.793, SHIP_ID_INT=1] autolearn=no autolearn_force=no
X-Policyd-Weight: using cached result; rate:
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii
Content-Disposition: inline
X-Mailing-List: <debian-python@lists.debian.org> archive/latest/19747
List-ID: <debian-python.lists.debian.org>
List-URL: <https://lists.debian.org/debian-python/>
List-Archive: https://lists.debian.org/msgid-search/YgIURuzffsDtQrW5@d-and-j.net
Approved: robomod@news.nic.it
Lines: 23
Organization: linux.* mail to news gateway
Sender: robomod@news.nic.it
X-Original-Date: Tue, 8 Feb 2022 06:57:10 +0000
X-Original-Message-ID: <YgIURuzffsDtQrW5@d-and-j.net>
X-Original-References: <164409460483.3521277.16549103784531274307.reportbug@erdos.d-and-j.net> <CAB4XWXxdmzZ23eHU9SO8uRQmGNZauoX0-eJX5wh=7WeW95_+bQ@mail.gmail.com> <Yf+86nLCmE/8MHMN@d-and-j.net> <20220206164653.chplpvjvyzhzkxiw@satie.tumbleweed.org.za> <YgC7nqqSTu+/aSSy@d-and-j.net> <20220208002601.mqhitz5vlumrqqip@satie.tumbleweed.org.za>
Xref: csiph.com linux.debian.maint.python:13934

On Tue, Feb 08, 2022 at 12:26:01AM +0000, Stefano Rivera wrote:
> Hi Julian (2022.02.07_06:26:38_+0000)
> > I'm a little confused by this.  Have a look at
> > https://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=1005039 against
> > python3-iniconfig.  It has a very straightforward debian/rules, using
> > pybuild, and its setup.py script has "use_scm_version=True", but it
> > still produces a python package with version number 0.0.0.
> > 
> > I have tried this in an environment where I have
> > python3-setuptools-scm installed, by the way (even though the package
> > does not Build-Depends on it).  I'm using dh-python version 5.20220119
> 
> That's the issue, it *needs* to Build-Depend on that (pybuild only
> exports the PRETEND environment variable when there is a
> Build-Dependency).
> 
> Committed a fix to git.

Ah, thanks Stefano!

Best wishes,

   Julian