Path: csiph.com!newsfeed.xs4all.nl!newsfeed8.news.xs4all.nl!bofh.it!news.nic.it!robomod From: Sandro Tosi Newsgroups: linux.debian.bugs.dist,linux.debian.maint.python Subject: Bug#1003567: Please make a separate package for mistune 2.x Date: Sat, 05 Feb 2022 23:00:13 +0100 Message-ID: References: X-Mailbox-Line: From debian-bugs-dist-request@lists.debian.org Sat Feb 5 21:57:09 2022 Old-Return-Path: X-Spam-Flag: NO X-Spam-Score: -6.9 Reply-To: Sandro Tosi , 1003567@bugs.debian.org Resent-To: debian-bugs-dist@lists.debian.org Resent-Cc: Debian Python Team X-Debian-Pr-Message: followup 1003567 X-Debian-Pr-Package: python3-schema-salad X-Debian-Pr-Source: python-schema-salad X-Gm-Message-State: AOAM533j4u2NBBbcV5mv16OkaIUwBscmcaT2O8RkV/4Y6uzMhcNFuGba LkvSnymGeRSpgVB9Mzu07Ukad/V4ay74rnypf4E= X-Google-SMTP-Source: ABdhPJw1EFSZ1MMhz/149PCEQWjtTo1Jiw32EEAn+b1PfWhdpx7NgkY11CZUDxLlt7BcOSQOUR6d4w/Zzom99D4EsNo= X-Received: by 2002:aa7:cdc8:: with SMTP id h8mr6426281edw.272.1644098024318; Sat, 05 Feb 2022 13:53:44 -0800 (PST) MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="UTF-8" X-Debian-Message: from BTS X-Mailing-List: archive/latest/1703704 List-ID: List-URL: Approved: robomod@news.nic.it Lines: 18 Organization: linux.* mail to news gateway Sender: robomod@news.nic.it X-Original-Cc: Nilesh Patra , Julian Gilbey , "Michael R. Crusoe" , 1003567@bugs.debian.org, debian-python X-Original-Date: Sat, 5 Feb 2022 16:53:18 -0500 X-Original-Message-ID: X-Original-References: <20220111213844.BE33D2C006E@pimeys.fr> <878rurbmr3.fsf@jaatynyt> <87sfsxc7ga.fsf@jaatynyt> <20220111213844.BE33D2C006E@pimeys.fr> <87sfsxc7ga.fsf@jaatynyt> Xref: csiph.com linux.debian.bugs.dist:1092186 linux.debian.maint.python:13927 > I'd like other python team member's opinion on this, and I'm not eager > to maintain that legacy package, as I tend to not want to maintain > obsolete software. Still, I can do the initial work of creating it. i wouldnt expect much maintenance needed tho: 0.8.4 is essentially dead upstream, so it will only need to be kept around until its rdeps are ported to mistune 2.x the proposal is "okay", it has the downside of requiring the current rdeps to be updated to point to the new binary package name for the old mistune, but it leaves the namespace open for mistune 2 to take over python3-mistune bin pkg -- Sandro "morph" Tosi My website: http://sandrotosi.me/ Me at Debian: http://wiki.debian.org/SandroTosi Twitter: https://twitter.com/sandrotosi