Path: csiph.com!newsfeed.xs4all.nl!newsfeed7.news.xs4all.nl!bofh.it!news.nic.it!robomod From: Jelmer Vernooij Newsgroups: linux.debian.maint.python Subject: Re: ponyorm v0.7.15rc1, python3.10 and github releases Date: Tue, 11 Jan 2022 15:20:01 +0100 Message-ID: References: X-Original-To: Louis-Philippe =?iso-8859-1?Q?V=E9ronneau?= X-Mailbox-Line: From debian-python-request@lists.debian.org Tue Jan 11 14:18:08 2022 Old-Return-Path: X-Amavis-Spam-Status: No, score=-5.68 tagged_above=-10000 required=5.3 tests=[BAYES_00=-2, BODY_8BITS=1.5, DKIM_SIGNED=0.1, DKIM_VALID=-0.1, DKIM_VALID_AU=-0.1, DKIM_VALID_EF=-0.1, LDO_WHITELIST=-5, MURPHY_DRUGS_REL8=0.02] autolearn=ham autolearn_force=no X-Policyd-Weight: using cached result; rate: -4.6 X-Greylist: delayed 458 seconds by postgrey-1.36 at bendel; Tue, 11 Jan 2022 14:02:32 UTC MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8 Content-Disposition: inline Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit User-Agent: Mutt/2.1.4 (2021-12-11) X-Mailing-List: archive/latest/19678 List-ID: List-URL: List-Archive: https://lists.debian.org/msgid-search/Yd2MLL6khPIheUAg@jelmer.uk Approved: robomod@news.nic.it Lines: 31 Organization: linux.* mail to news gateway Sender: robomod@news.nic.it X-Original-Cc: debian-python@lists.debian.org X-Original-Date: Tue, 11 Jan 2022 13:54:52 +0000 X-Original-Message-ID: X-Original-References: <08e10968-05b2-8616-55eb-68fb624a0d7e@debian.org> Xref: csiph.com linux.debian.maint.python:13865 Hi Louis-Philippe, Yeah, that sounds good to me - thanks for working on ponyorm! Jelmer On Mon, Jan 10, 2022 at 06:05:06PM -0500, Louis-Philippe Véronneau wrote: > Hello! > > Upstream ponyorm released v0.7.15rc1, which adds python3.10 support and > thus fixes #1000716. I ran a quick sbuild and the testsuite passes and > everything seems good. > > Since it is team maintained, I'd have updated the package in unstable, > but the latest pypi tarball changes the default carriage return, and > creates a huge diff on the upstream branch. This causes some patches to > fail to apply, etc. > > Would you mind if I migrated ponyorm to the github releases, using > uscan's git mode? I've made a quick test and it does solves this issue :) > > Asking, since I'd be pretty upset if someone were to do the opposite on > a package I team maintain :P > > Cheers, > > -- > ⢀⣴⠾⠻⢶⣦⠀ > ⣾⠁⢠⠒⠀⣿⡁ Louis-Philippe Véronneau > ⢿⡄⠘⠷⠚⠋ pollo@debian.org / veronneau.org > ⠈⠳⣄