Path: csiph.com!newsfeed.xs4all.nl!newsfeed8.news.xs4all.nl!bofh.it!news.nic.it!robomod From: Emmanuel Arias Newsgroups: linux.debian.maint.python Subject: Re: Status of poetry Date: Fri, 31 Dec 2021 18:50:01 +0100 Message-ID: References: X-Mailbox-Line: From debian-python-request@lists.debian.org Fri Dec 31 17:45:27 2021 Old-Return-Path: X-Amavis-Spam-Status: No, score=-5 tagged_above=-10000 required=5.3 tests=[BAYES_00=-2, DKIM_SIGNED=0.1, DKIM_VALID=-0.1, HTML_MESSAGE=2, LDO_WHITELIST=-5, RCVD_IN_DNSWL_NONE=-0.0001] autolearn=no autolearn_force=no X-Policyd-Weight: NOT_IN_SBL_XBL_SPAMHAUS=-1.5 CL_IP_EQ_HELO_IP=-2 (check from: .yaerobi. - helo: .mail-ed1-x534.google. - helo-domain: .google.) FROM/MX_MATCHES_HELO(DOMAIN)=-2; rate: -5.5 X-Gm-Message-State: AOAM532nz0TLvKgSyKm97a+5JNRXk+YvlGRaMWkGIaylgyRumOHuy2vZ gRhKcNByZkT/4FA9Wqay+QDckDKVbwlnKNgbahgbZw== X-Google-SMTP-Source: ABdhPJwI/7a0dCF0HO0O3gSrvLEl8wTHNsA9053OmgSCfFzGkKtt2Y4AZa3SOrOKS5dJ+XtUqnq16Z2gt1LPhAC9oKg= X-Received: by 2002:a17:906:3ed0:: with SMTP id d16mr28336819ejj.636.1640972708877; Fri, 31 Dec 2021 09:45:08 -0800 (PST) MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: multipart/alternative; boundary="000000000000662f4a05d474bb8e" X-Mailing-List: archive/latest/19649 List-ID: List-URL: List-Archive: https://lists.debian.org/msgid-search/CAFNO5oc8-r6xB3XYLUtgepv_5Vyxt0RRL5D8QVgE_uGVN3wbSg@mail.gmail.com Approved: robomod@news.nic.it Lines: 55 Organization: linux.* mail to news gateway Sender: robomod@news.nic.it X-Original-Cc: =?UTF-8?Q?Pierre=2DElliott_B=C3=A9cue?= , debian-python X-Original-Date: Fri, 31 Dec 2021 14:44:56 -0300 X-Original-Message-ID: X-Original-References: Xref: csiph.com linux.debian.maint.python:13836 --000000000000662f4a05d474bb8e Content-Type: text/plain; charset="UTF-8" Hi! On Fri, Dec 31, 2021 at 2:31 PM Taihsiang Ho (tai271828) wrote: > > More details regarding my testing if you are interested in: > I was aware that the package with the fixed python 3.10 testing error[1] > has been published when trying to fix the 3.10 testing error[1] during my > Christmas holidays, so I gave the published package a try instead by using > the binary deb. > Yes! Thanks for reporting the error, and yes, that was fixed by Sandro in version 1.1.11+dfsg-3. > The overall testing of the deb looks good for me. I used the binary deb > "python3-poetry"[2] to re-build my blog, which is a pelican-based project > managed by poetry, with Sid. I can smoothly re-build my blog and > publish/host it with an Apache server. > That is amazing. Thanks for testing it! Cheers! --000000000000662f4a05d474bb8e Content-Type: text/html; charset="UTF-8" Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable
Hi!

On Fri, Dec 31, 2021 at 2:31 PM Ta= ihsiang Ho (tai271828) <e@tai271828.me= > wrote:
=

More details regarding my testing if you are intereste= d in:
I was aware that the package with the fixed python 3.10 testing er= ror[1] has been published when trying to fix the 3.10 testing error[1] duri= ng my Christmas holidays, so I gave the published package a try instead by = using the binary deb.

Yes! Thanks= for reporting the error, and yes, that was fixed by Sandro in
ve= rsion 1.1.11+dfsg-3.


The overall testing of the deb looks g= ood for me. I used the binary deb "python3-poetry"[2] to re-build= my blog, which is a pelican-based project managed by poetry, with Sid. I c= an smoothly re-build my blog and publish/host it with an Apache server.
=

That is amazing. Thanks for testing = it!

Cheers!
--000000000000662f4a05d474bb8e--