Path: csiph.com!newsfeed.xs4all.nl!newsfeed7.news.xs4all.nl!bofh.it!news.nic.it!robomod From: Stuart Prescott Newsgroups: linux.debian.maint.python Subject: mypy and typeshed Date: Thu, 23 Sep 2021 06:00:01 +0200 Message-ID: X-Mailbox-Line: From debian-python-request@lists.debian.org Thu Sep 23 03:51:42 2021 Old-Return-Path: X-Amavis-Spam-Status: No, score=-6.75 tagged_above=-10000 required=5.3 tests=[BAYES_00=-2, DKIM_SIGNED=0.1, DKIM_VALID=-0.1, HEADER_FROM_DIFFERENT_DOMAINS=0.25, LDO_WHITELIST=-5, RCVD_IN_DNSWL_NONE=-0.0001] autolearn=ham autolearn_force=no X-Policyd-Weight: NOT_IN_SBL_XBL_SPAMHAUS=-1.5 CL_IP_EQ_HELO_IP=-2 (check from: .nanonanonano. - helo: .mail-pj1-x1032.google. - helo-domain: .google.) FROM/MX_MATCHES_HELO(DOMAIN)=-2; rate: -5.5 X-Gm-Message-State: AOAM5317ABnLXBqPV8H6btZ0t1cF3sMCmkXedLil0EUGgb35vDpgLCF2 L/p+KGjfqmbnlJjmrOYixwdBBw== X-Google-SMTP-Source: ABdhPJxhcQwvA+GX/BZgHTgTjzM3OO0vOrMqcqW5sYx7MvfuejNhM+CApVEJCAATXGMSNdROD0p14A== X-Received: by 2002:a17:90a:9a8b:: with SMTP id e11mr2896557pjp.102.1632369083741; Wed, 22 Sep 2021 20:51:23 -0700 (PDT) Sender: robomod@news.nic.it MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7Bit Content-Type: text/plain; charset="utf-8" X-Mailing-List: archive/latest/19363 List-ID: List-URL: List-Archive: https://lists.debian.org/msgid-search/2252926.q746WjKLvy@simurgh Approved: robomod@news.nic.it Lines: 23 Organization: linux.* mail to news gateway X-Original-Cc: debian-python@lists.debian.org X-Original-Date: Thu, 23 Sep 2021 13:51:19 +1000 X-Original-Message-ID: <2252926.q746WjKLvy@simurgh> X-Original-Sender: Stuart Prescott Xref: csiph.com linux.debian.maint.python:13567 Hi Michael thanks for uploading the new version of mypy :) With the new mypy, it seems one needs a "pip install types-foo" for just about everything before it is able to usefully analyse code. I see #994830 for python-types-dataclasses, and we have python3-types-toml plus python3-types- typed-ast. Are you already working towards packaging more of the split off typeshed, or do we need a bit more of a team effort on this? Does it make sense for Debian to package snapshots of all of typeshed in one binary package to save a proliferation of small python-types-foo packages? cheers Stuart -- Stuart Prescott http://www.nanonanonano.net/ stuart@nanonanonano.net Debian Developer http://www.debian.org/ stuart@debian.org GPG fingerprint 90E2 D2C1 AD14 6A1B 7EBB 891D BBC1 7EBB 1396 F2F7