Path: csiph.com!news.dns-netz.com!news.freedyn.net!aioe.org!bofh.it!news.nic.it!robomod From: Andrius Merkys Newsgroups: linux.debian.maint.python Subject: Re: Remove trac from Debian 11? Date: Mon, 10 May 2021 13:10:01 +0200 Message-ID: References: X-Original-To: debian-python@lists.debian.org X-Mailbox-Line: From debian-python-request@lists.debian.org Mon May 10 11:00:23 2021 Old-Return-Path: X-Amavis-Spam-Status: No, score=-6.502 tagged_above=-10000 required=5.3 tests=[BAYES_00=-2, FREEMAIL_FORGED_FROMDOMAIN=0.249, FREEMAIL_FROM=0.001, HEADER_FROM_DIFFERENT_DOMAINS=0.25, LDO_WHITELIST=-5, NICE_REPLY_A=-0.001, RCVD_IN_DNSWL_NONE=-0.0001, RCVD_IN_MSPIKE_H2=-0.001] autolearn=ham autolearn_force=no X-Policyd-Weight: using cached result; rate: -5.5 X-Gm-Message-State: AOAM533gfXo1mnmSa5+OgW0L7zy/BdVwvtdQoENjtVQfuPws3EYc+eGL MlOY4mXD3QV0MW8P+imFiQU/BqBLy7U= X-Google-SMTP-Source: ABdhPJxljLsMd5jZANqQFulxsVqstC2bE7Svai4tdXG+1BOh8c2mIAUFlA3REPVZFo1MieqD+6v5dA== X-Received: by 2002:a19:7402:: with SMTP id v2mr16093167lfe.616.1620644407231; Mon, 10 May 2021 04:00:07 -0700 (PDT) User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (X11; Linux x86_64; rv:78.0) Gecko/20100101 Thunderbird/78.7.1 MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8 Content-Language: en-US Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-Mailing-List: archive/latest/19131 List-ID: List-URL: List-Archive: https://lists.debian.org/msgid-search/c27ef827-e554-e41e-ddad-030ac9ef28ef@debian.org Approved: robomod@news.nic.it Lines: 23 Organization: linux.* mail to news gateway Sender: robomod@news.nic.it X-Original-Date: Mon, 10 May 2021 14:00:06 +0300 X-Original-Message-ID: X-Original-References: Xref: csiph.com linux.debian.maint.python:13344 Hi Martin, On 2021-05-10 13:35, Martin wrote: > trac is a long-time Debian package, uploaded first by Jesus > Climent in 2004. I like the traditional look of Trac and its > climate-friendly resource usage :-) > > Now, while Trac is still maintained upstream and has been ported > to Python 3 recently, development slowed down since long and the > current 1.5.x release series is not yet "there". > > I wonder, whether the package should be part of Debian 11, or > better miss one stable release and have it in better shape for > Debian 12. > > If nobody objects, I'll file a bug to keep it out of Debian 11. I do not think that slowing down of development is reason serious enough to remove a package which is otherwise fine. Or are there other reasons that I am not aware of? Best, Andrius