Path: csiph.com!newsfeed.xs4all.nl!newsfeed9.news.xs4all.nl!bofh.it!news.nic.it!robomod From: Carsten Schoenert Newsgroups: linux.debian.maint.python Subject: Re: python-django-js-asset_1.2.2-3_source.changes REJECTED Date: Sun, 19 Sep 2021 23:10:02 +0200 Message-ID: References: X-Mailbox-Line: From debian-python-request@lists.debian.org Sun Sep 19 21:05:21 2021 Old-Return-Path: X-Amavis-Spam-Status: No, score=-8.969 tagged_above=-10000 required=5.3 tests=[BAYES_00=-2, DIGITS_LETTERS=1, FREEMAIL_FROM=0.001, LDO_WHITELIST=-5, MD5_SHA1_SUM=-1, NICE_REPLY_A=-1.969, RCVD_IN_DNSWL_NONE=-0.0001, RCVD_IN_MSPIKE_H2=-0.001] autolearn=ham autolearn_force=no X-Policyd-Weight: using cached result; rate:hard: -5.5 X-Greylist: delayed 511 seconds by postgrey-1.36 at bendel; Sun, 19 Sep 2021 21:05:09 UTC MIME-Version: 1.0 User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (X11; Linux x86_64; rv:91.0) Gecko/20100101 Thunderbird/91.1.0 Content-Language: en-US Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-Toi-Expurgateid: 150726::1632084994-000076AB-A31FF22B/0/0 CLEAN NORMAL X-Toi-Msgid: f8bdfb5d-5943-4630-bce1-78cb30145370 X-Mailing-List: archive/latest/19349 List-ID: List-URL: List-Archive: https://lists.debian.org/msgid-search/256be314-dabd-a2cc-1c9e-a2bfaad030a5@t-online.de Approved: robomod@news.nic.it Lines: 35 Organization: linux.* mail to news gateway Sender: robomod@news.nic.it X-Original-Date: Sun, 19 Sep 2021 22:56:33 +0200 X-Original-Message-ID: <256be314-dabd-a2cc-1c9e-a2bfaad030a5@t-online.de> X-Original-References: <1f944d96-c152-3a50-a20f-f0c5137493ce@t-online.de> Xref: csiph.com linux.debian.maint.python:13553 Hi Antonio, thanks for your quick feedback! Am 19.09.21 um 21:24 schrieb Antonio Terceiro: > Looking from my side, the tarball from the archive (apt source > python-django-js-asset) and the one generated by pristine-tar are > identical: > > 4b6a2c8625b8e96bbc4ff1588a27238d7d418b03 /tmp/python-django-js-asset_1.2.2.orig.tar.gz > 4b6a2c8625b8e96bbc4ff1588a27238d7d418b03 /tmp/archive/python-django-js-asset_1.2.2.orig.tar.gz > > From reading the REJECT email, I think it implies that the .dsc/.changes > you uploaded refer to an orig tarball with 6360 bytes. Do you still have > the exact artifacts that you uploaded? No, not completely. But I played around a bit with gbp and pristine-tar too and I was able to recreate a tarball which has the same size and the same hashes as the *.tar.gz in the archive and the one you've posted by using pristine-tar manually. If I clean out all completely and build the package from scratch by gbp I get again a wrong size and of course also different hashes. Currently I've no real clue why gbp is creating here different results, will look again at this once Guido is around, I'm sure he can blame me that I'm doing something wrong. :P I was able to upload 1.2.2-3 successful recently so no big problem any more. -- Regards Carsten