Path: csiph.com!newsfeed.xs4all.nl!newsfeed7.news.xs4all.nl!bofh.it!news.nic.it!robomod From: Mattia Rizzolo Newsgroups: linux.debian.maint.python Subject: Re: Moving forward with more Python 2 removal, plus upgrading to markupsafe 2.0, jinja2 3.0, werkzeug 2.0 and flask 2.0 Date: Sat, 18 Sep 2021 17:40:02 +0200 Message-ID: References: X-Original-To: debian-python@lists.debian.org X-Mailbox-Line: From debian-python-request@lists.debian.org Sat Sep 18 15:30:21 2021 Old-Return-Path: X-Amavis-Spam-Status: No, score=-11.88 tagged_above=-10000 required=5.3 tests=[BAYES_00=-2, FOURLA=0.1, FVGT_m_MULTI_ODD=0.02, LDO_WHITELIST=-5, PGPSIGNATURE=-5] autolearn=ham autolearn_force=no X-Policyd-Weight: using cached result; rate:hard: -3.5 Mail-Followup-To: debian-python@lists.debian.org MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: multipart/signed; micalg=pgp-sha512; protocol="application/pgp-signature"; boundary="cPzDkRS4v5W38mNT" Content-Disposition: inline X-Info: Keep It Simple, Stupid. X-Operating-System: Linux, kernel 5.2.0-2-amd64, inside Debian GNU/Linux bookworm/sid sid. X-Message-Flag: WARNING!! Outlook sucks. A lot. User-Agent: Every email client sucks, this one just sucks less. X-Mailing-List: archive/latest/19342 List-ID: List-URL: List-Archive: https://lists.debian.org/msgid-search/YUYF3VTTmD+QkF9m@mapreri.org Approved: robomod@news.nic.it Lines: 59 Organization: linux.* mail to news gateway Sender: robomod@news.nic.it X-Original-Date: Sat, 18 Sep 2021 17:29:33 +0200 X-Original-Message-ID: X-Original-References: <42d57259-e9e7-0c91-7a09-e15201cca244@debian.org> Xref: csiph.com linux.debian.maint.python:13546 --cPzDkRS4v5W38mNT Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable On Sat, Sep 18, 2021 at 03:02:01PM +0200, Thomas Goirand wrote: > During the python BoF of the last Debconf, we decided to go ahead with > full removal of Python 2, so doing this looks like a move to the right > direction. Yes indeed. > Is it fine for everyone (including Piotr, who's the only marked uploader > for these) if I upload these to Experimental right now (which is where I > am uploading OpenStack Xena), and in Unstable after the 8th of October > (when OpenStack Xena will be finally released)? >=20 > I'm also aware that the packages I mentioned above are high profile (ie: > used a lot in Debian), which is why I thought announcing my plan was a > good idea (also so that Piotr can tell his opinion). Sounds a sound plan to me, however please remember to check the pseudo-excuses-experimental here before moving to unstable, to at least fix whatever autopkgtest breaks before said breaking upload. https://release.debian.org/britney/pseudo-excuses-experimental.html That ought to prevent plenty of headaches we would otheriwse have. --=20 regards, Mattia Rizzolo GPG Key: 66AE 2B4A FCCF 3F52 DA18 4D18 4B04 3FCD B944 4540 .''`. More about me: https://mapreri.org : :' : Launchpad user: https://launchpad.net/~mapreri `. `'` Debian QA page: https://qa.debian.org/developer.php?login=3Dmattia `- --cPzDkRS4v5W38mNT Content-Type: application/pgp-signature; name="signature.asc" -----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE----- iQIzBAEBCgAdFiEEi3hoeGwz5cZMTQpICBa54Yx2K60FAmFGBdsACgkQCBa54Yx2 K63h1RAAs1vVxHL6uBWsSBXdaX7enH+QROEVgZxmeEn4qjK3BSfkbkRuo0cBs/EZ T98/0wMFodhUqnJ3CvH4rQ3G5IXf6BhtF1gAkXTqAhyvDUlay/EObgpN8PseWsfv yJh2wtpfO0sjqSh0JsY5R3u8XuXDj47Kox01a39Ix/oWtpH+Luf13ZMA9u/8tZSb JxLf3FdWTwG2Z2TvkJK+4vnfG5II0ocxsfPeklykFQKv36ogHaqfM2M/6FRs/xRF QSL+eWiCleCv+146gPYrLxUTBjgzsNYGy/jNI82+HhdtP1CWu9o2Xy+3ctCX8+AN v5sUvFq2JX6mfDVvJuaaJ1f45h3hLaD+4BAT2LHhngeRz/nphttaTqeG7L6MsPSn S11YU8WYc7ZqyTdMadntHc32zGr6q1MKzMF++e23GOJij/v+EnezIwCS+3e+rLzs tfyvzu7HQ+9lcGmvMEP1M6VxYYDLLJPY3u/enotXi6ucof5VdPoBvcCdTNQ4Lra6 VMIt41CpPGU6xWI0f3xQz/9No0p/n1m3OL5yzJtNIw1vNqMa9Nu0Lec4PQlvMa+w veQfvdhFgiBAD2nF6gqniXKUMNLLcIHNRfiX99l1g4UkeWxcY1EErEmMGCIulB1T JnKJGf5y2c3f/aa+Okaa6eFQY8UcOWGOLsQQnHwOz1RCpnDiCLw= =ZP3F -----END PGP SIGNATURE----- --cPzDkRS4v5W38mNT--