Path: csiph.com!newsfeed.xs4all.nl!newsfeed7.news.xs4all.nl!news.uzoreto.com!aioe.org!bofh.it!news.nic.it!robomod From: Arturo Borrero Gonzalez Newsgroups: linux.debian.maint.python Subject: Re: Fwd: My deep mistake with the python-absl package Date: Mon, 19 Apr 2021 14:00:01 +0200 Message-ID: References: X-Original-To: debian-python@lists.debian.org X-Mailbox-Line: From debian-python-request@lists.debian.org Mon Apr 19 11:54:08 2021 Old-Return-Path: X-Amavis-Spam-Status: No, score=-6.502 tagged_above=-10000 required=5.3 tests=[BAYES_00=-2, FREEMAIL_FORGED_FROMDOMAIN=0.249, FREEMAIL_FROM=0.001, HEADER_FROM_DIFFERENT_DOMAINS=0.25, LDO_WHITELIST=-5, NICE_REPLY_A=-0.001, RCVD_IN_DNSWL_NONE=-0.0001, RCVD_IN_MSPIKE_H2=-0.001] autolearn=ham autolearn_force=no X-Policyd-Weight: using cached result; rate: -5.5 X-Gm-Message-State: AOAM531GIZbYK37Sl4rVDvIZxObXU3VXqKbGj1iELm54i8fc8r/ybWM5 ynrH51pNxrOqMUT7MbOGt8Y= X-Google-SMTP-Source: ABdhPJwq+a5atkibOr1+9z9+KH+eS/NSTkrVJwmzGVvC1EUImgTEZ9+8Hz9Nw5hZh6idEkV8PMOs1Q== X-Received: by 2002:a1c:720d:: with SMTP id n13mr20288309wmc.89.1618832176185; Mon, 19 Apr 2021 04:36:16 -0700 (PDT) User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (X11; Linux x86_64; rv:78.0) Gecko/20100101 Thunderbird/78.9.0 MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=windows-1252; format=flowed Content-Language: en-US Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-Mailing-List: archive/latest/19111 List-ID: List-URL: List-Archive: https://lists.debian.org/msgid-search/c058c7e1-aa27-ce01-7fea-2eb25506a50d@debian.org Approved: robomod@news.nic.it Lines: 38 Organization: linux.* mail to news gateway Sender: robomod@news.nic.it X-Original-Cc: Mattia Rizzolo X-Original-Date: Mon, 19 Apr 2021 13:36:14 +0200 X-Original-Message-ID: X-Original-References: <365d81d3-6634-1a7b-1ef0-c4feb493942e@debian.org> <32e1254e-23b9-04d0-b549-f8fb7161e1b0@debian.org> Xref: csiph.com linux.debian.maint.python:13324 On 4/19/21 12:54 PM, Mattia Rizzolo wrote: > Hi Arturo, > > On Mon, Apr 19, 2021 at 03:46:55PM +0500, Andrey Rahmatullin wrote: >> On Mon, Apr 19, 2021 at 11:12:01AM +0200, Arturo Borrero Gonzalez wrote: >>> * We could upload a new version of python-absl and just replace/overwrite my >>> upload. I noticed your original repo [0] contains a pretty up-to-date >>> version that could work. >> >> I'm not the package maintainer but I'd suggest either rolling back to the >> contents of 0.11.0-1 (pro: we are frozen; con: unlikely that the second >> upload breaks anything as the package is not in testing and doesn't have >> revdeps) or just uploading 0.12.0-2 based on 0.11.0-1, integrating >> improvements from 0.12.0-1 if needed. >> There is also a question of the salsa repo history, not sure if it should >> contain 0.12.0-1 or not (pro: having all versions in the repo, no >> confusion over the missing version; con: confusion over two uploads each >> rewriting the previous one). > > If you are fine, I can take this approach. I'll include your 0.12.0-1 > upload in the repository, merge them both, give back maintership to the > DPT and whoever was in Uploaders, and upload the final as 0.12.0-2. I > don't think there is any gain whatsoever in rolling back to 0.11.0 at > this point. > Lastly, I'll ask the salsa admins to remove the repository you created > in the /debian/ space. > > If you are interested in this package I recommend you join the DPT then > :) > Your proposal sounds right to me Mattia. Please go ahead! regards.