Path: csiph.com!3.eu.feeder.erje.net!feeder.erje.net!weretis.net!feeder8.news.weretis.net!news.mixmin.net!aioe.org!bofh.it!news.nic.it!robomod From: Graham Inggs Newsgroups: linux.debian.maint.python Subject: Re: Python 3.9 & Numba Date: Tue, 19 Jan 2021 21:00:02 +0100 Message-ID: References: X-Mailbox-Line: From debian-python-request@lists.debian.org Tue Jan 19 19:53:04 2021 Old-Return-Path: X-Amavis-Spam-Status: No, score=-5.678 tagged_above=-10000 required=5.3 tests=[BAYES_00=-2, LDO_WHITELIST=-5, MEDS2=2, MURPHY_DRUGS_REL8=0.02, RCVD_IN_DNSWL_LOW=-0.7, RCVD_IN_MSPIKE_H3=0.001, RCVD_IN_MSPIKE_WL=0.001] autolearn=no autolearn_force=no X-Policyd-Weight: using cached result; rate: -4.6 X-Riseup-User-ID: 1AED65A6F6EDAAA6DFA91E4D5D2959B5D3B94EF22778FA6B49ECDBE77FC7BAFF X-Gm-Message-State: AOAM533Vcr2oF1b0g/5Og47Fp21rlINqdzEOH/IjBj4vfaRu+LjPkuQ5 LHM5SIVPdjtz2VsFUp8ZN0R5jOEVA2sdhmYycGs= X-Google-SMTP-Source: ABdhPJxuRnqHPfVsGJEoXe4/c9Zl2RZ6ovB+DcEU22QUEMcvhkzxPlubteSqfn/K8Mi4+kQYxQFMZuzP3somVl9C9w8= X-Received: by 2002:a50:e719:: with SMTP id a25mr4707176edn.12.1611085962886; Tue, 19 Jan 2021 11:52:42 -0800 (PST) MIME-Version: 1.0 X-Gmail-Original-Message-ID: Content-Type: text/plain; charset="UTF-8" X-Mailing-List: archive/latest/18892 List-ID: List-URL: List-Archive: https://lists.debian.org/msgid-search/CAM8zJQuWBrjLvzjFcD6RR1V0ugxLDLF5Ynu+nApX+KfwRuPTMg@mail.gmail.com Approved: robomod@news.nic.it Lines: 22 Organization: linux.* mail to news gateway Sender: robomod@news.nic.it X-Original-Cc: Debian Python , debian-astro-maintainers@lists.alioth.debian.org, Debian Science Maintainers X-Original-Date: Tue, 19 Jan 2021 21:52:31 +0200 X-Original-Message-ID: X-Original-References: <06ab928082669aa2099f596bd24def88e09b11fa.camel@ghic.org> Xref: csiph.com linux.debian.maint.python:13116 Hi Diane On Tue, 19 Jan 2021 at 08:04, Diane Trout wrote: > Does Mo Zhou want to review the commits to numba? Or should I push them > to the main numba packaging repository? (I'm in the python, science, > and med teams) Numba is orphaned, see #935626, so I think go ahead and adopt the package and push to the main repo. > I was guessing the most likely path would be to make an experimental > release of numba 0.52.0 with the compatibility patch and then see how > pandas, astro team packages do with it. Numba is not in testing, so I don't see why you shouldn't upload directly to unstable. Packages that optionally depend on numba can upload versions re-enabling numba support to experimental and see how they fare. Regards Graham