Path: csiph.com!newsfeed.xs4all.nl!newsfeed9.news.xs4all.nl!news.dns-netz.com!news.freedyn.net!aioe.org!bofh.it!news.nic.it!robomod From: Bastian Venthur Newsgroups: linux.debian.maint.python Subject: Re: Asking for help Poetry Date: Thu, 19 Nov 2020 16:20:02 +0100 Message-ID: References: X-Mailbox-Line: From debian-python-request@lists.debian.org Thu Nov 19 15:16:03 2020 Old-Return-Path: X-Amavis-Spam-Status: No, score=-3.923 tagged_above=-10000 required=5.3 tests=[BAYES_00=-2, FORGED_MUA_MOZILLA=2.309, FOURLA=0.1, HEADER_FROM_DIFFERENT_DOMAINS=0.25, KHOP_HELO_FCRDNS=0.399, LDO_WHITELIST=-5, MURPHY_DRUGS_REL8=0.02, NICE_REPLY_A=-0.001] autolearn=no autolearn_force=no X-Policyd-Weight: using cached result; rate:hard: -4.6 X-Injected-Via-Gmane: http://gmane.org/ MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (X11; Linux x86_64; rv:78.0) Gecko/20100101 Thunderbird/78.5.0 Content-Language: en-US X-Mailing-List: archive/latest/18780 List-ID: List-URL: List-Archive: https://lists.debian.org/msgid-search/rp626s$mjb$1@ciao.gmane.io Approved: robomod@news.nic.it Lines: 51 Organization: linux.* mail to news gateway Sender: robomod@news.nic.it X-Original-Date: Thu, 19 Nov 2020 16:15:40 +0100 X-Original-Message-ID: X-Original-References: Xref: csiph.com linux.debian.maint.python:13015 Hi, I see some updates on the salsa repository, any chance we can get this package ready before the next freeze so we'll have it in the next stable release? Cheers, Bastian On 29.06.20 06:04, Scott Kitterman wrote: > > > On June 29, 2020 3:08:53 AM UTC, Emmanuel Arias wrote: >> Hi, >> >> I'm working on poetry packaging, I created on salsa de repository [0]. >> >> Note that there are many packages that are not in Debian like cachy, >> cleo, >> etc. >> >> I RFS python-cachy [1] and now I'm working on cleo, which depends on >> clikit >> that is not on Debian (if I search correctly). >> >> Bastian Venthur note me that pienv, pip have vendors folder with the >> dependencies >> but looking on poetry that _vendor folder is empty. >> >> So, looking for I more experienced opinion, do you think that we would >> try >> convince >> to upstream to make available vendors on the release (if that is >> necessary) >> or >> we need to package all the missing dependencies? > > Definitely they should be packaged. > > At least for pip none of the vendored libs are used in Debian's package. Fortunately upstream supports use of system libs with only minor patching. > > Scott K > > -- Dr. Bastian Venthur http://venthur.de Debian Developer venthur at debian org