Path: csiph.com!3.eu.feeder.erje.net!feeder.erje.net!usenet.goja.nl.eu.org!aioe.org!bofh.it!news.nic.it!robomod From: Martin Newsgroups: linux.debian.maint.python Subject: Re: upstream python concerns, python3-full package for bullseye Date: Fri, 12 Feb 2021 11:30:02 +0100 Message-ID: References: X-Original-To: Thomas Goirand X-Mailbox-Line: From debian-python-request@lists.debian.org Fri Feb 12 10:26:12 2021 Old-Return-Path: X-Amavis-Spam-Status: No, score=-6.04 tagged_above=-10000 required=5.3 tests=[BAYES_00=-2, LDO_WHITELIST=-5, RCVD_IN_DNSWL_LOW=-0.7, SARE_MLH_Stock10=1.66] autolearn=ham autolearn_force=no X-Policyd-Weight: using cached result; rate: -3.5 Old-X-Envelope-From: debacle@debian.org MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8 Content-Disposition: inline Accept-Language: de, en, es X-Mailing-List: archive/latest/18986 List-ID: List-URL: List-Archive: https://lists.debian.org/msgid-search/YCZXtDFGkliV5Tvb@fama Approved: robomod@news.nic.it Lines: 13 Organization: linux.* mail to news gateway Sender: robomod@news.nic.it X-Original-Cc: debian-python@lists.debian.org X-Original-Date: Fri, 12 Feb 2021 11:25:56 +0100 X-Original-Message-ID: X-Original-References: <20210211181234.GA4829@silverpine> <5c9a9365-20b9-c600-638c-6c74a024779a@debian.org> <20210212004259.dnrbzkfkszwqctpw@satie.tumbleweed.org.za> Xref: csiph.com linux.debian.maint.python:13203 On 2021-02-12 10:16, Thomas Goirand wrote: > I mostly agree to add a metapackage. I just don't agree with the choice > of package name. It makes our user believe that Python isn't "full" > without it, and they then may install it when they don't need it to > consume whatever is packaged in Debian. Reality is different. I agree with your technical point of view. Friends don't let friends use pip and I banned its use at work. I don't care about having the package or not and how it were named, as long as it remains easy to not have it. Cheers