Path: csiph.com!news.mixmin.net!aioe.org!bofh.it!news.nic.it!robomod From: Michael Hudson-Doyle Newsgroups: linux.debian.maint.python Subject: Re: Python 3.9 for bullseye Date: Wed, 11 Nov 2020 03:50:02 +0100 Message-ID: References: X-Original-To: Matthias Klose X-Mailbox-Line: From debian-python-request@lists.debian.org Wed Nov 11 02:45:24 2020 Old-Return-Path: X-Amavis-Spam-Status: No, score=-8.34 tagged_above=-10000 required=5.3 tests=[BAYES_00=-2, HTML_MESSAGE=2, LDO_WHITELIST=-5, MURPHY_DRUGS_REL8=0.02, RCVD_IN_DNSWL_HI=-5, RCVD_IN_MSPIKE_H3=-0.01, RCVD_IN_MSPIKE_WL=-0.01, SARE_MLH_Stock10=1.66] autolearn=unavailable autolearn_force=no X-Policyd-Weight: using cached result; rate: -5.5 X-Google-Dkim-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=1e100.net; s=20161025; h=x-gm-message-state:mime-version:references:in-reply-to:from:date :message-id:subject:to:cc; bh=x1uq5rbAlf9OFMt/atLK3FyXqd+keNK9N7BT7e42Eiw=; b=PAy6Ne8lHSdImNOxwca/TUPvPITwPJ0Bwt/Sf3ASLpL1Kbenxl7jR+HlkRVg3dWh0/ ZPRD1BIzK0zMpnjssDspUeXgvvJKlKJO9SLq0KCqzfh5OkgXLsKWS1snJVFDgAzn7Q7l MbPYabsxHKre8TScIhIju5r7FG5kvqdacvXHcSNg6Y5ENKsaswglCEvYGG/MOKAYPMjb o9BgmghE3+86FrNQsyhk0qEPSPzBAZfu2eixpUOnsiS0Bd+i8lm9EKsKItTxMBKHVRT4 tci+i/7T97dJoGqRZRLeRQPtYRivaFX81UWzfPQ5EP1fImKnw+Os+2JZEwthMHA69saj NRXw== X-Gm-Message-State: AOAM530t56xqmyCFRvSmi40f9x4V1A0Ri8PLpHZWjgnKbF8jzGpN6gR1 +CRRJCH1QgnJ6m7TkezB80QQuapmHACd1Lntr8NmeRK9CtrcT8d7iPYG0eMMv3YBOPS6ITJVdE2 27b34f1U50jdcRzTg+zUyODDpMKsVg5b/BeyYOBnwLPk+kj/1nAqjNtgIgHF2 X-Received: by 2002:a92:9845:: with SMTP id l66mr15613811ili.65.1605061664545; Tue, 10 Nov 2020 18:27:44 -0800 (PST) X-Google-SMTP-Source: ABdhPJzpSTnnrKsXf/CcCiNu/+GSoJn6yL2ioypH/LC5m+Hqg6lP8kcn4SCxzeaXyujnEWmwyllCpAdH+RgtYEz+zgg= X-Received: by 2002:a92:9845:: with SMTP id l66mr15613803ili.65.1605061664364; Tue, 10 Nov 2020 18:27:44 -0800 (PST) MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: multipart/alternative; boundary="00000000000058edbf05b3cb8a72" X-Mailing-List: archive/latest/18774 List-ID: List-URL: List-Archive: https://lists.debian.org/msgid-search/CAJ8wqtdDe6x00xf6COO-=tGr2+sogob-4Ka4YJc9MhdPOmjV6A@mail.gmail.com Approved: robomod@news.nic.it Lines: 327 Organization: linux.* mail to news gateway Sender: robomod@news.nic.it X-Original-Cc: debian-python , Debian Science List , debian-gis@lists.debian.org, "Rebecca N. Palmer" , Debian-Med Packaging Team , Debichem Team X-Original-Date: Wed, 11 Nov 2020 15:27:33 +1300 X-Original-Message-ID: X-Original-References: <1e8a1ace-a38a-1d6a-fe10-d9e33e9c5896@debian.org> <55045375-f601-3c78-954b-857b0bef4698@debian.org> <54e8f537-4060-0fb0-b065-4d2226d5d031@debian.org> Xref: csiph.com linux.debian.maint.python:13010 --00000000000058edbf05b3cb8a72 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="UTF-8" On Mon, 9 Nov 2020 at 22:20, Matthias Klose wrote: > On 10/23/20 1:07 PM, Matthias Klose wrote: > > On 10/18/20 12:13 PM, Matthias Klose wrote: > >> Python 3.9 as a supported Python3 version is now in unstable, and all > binNMUs > >> are done (thanks to Graham for the work). Bug reports should be all > filed for > >> all known problems [1], and the current state of the 3.9 addition can > be seen at > >> [2] (a few of the "bad" are false packages with b-d n python3-all-dev, > but not > >> building for 3.9, bug reports also filed). > >> > >> The major outstanding issue is the pandas stack, all other problems are > found in > >> leaf packages (leaf in the sense of that no other package for the 3.9 > addition > >> is blocked). > >> > >> Please help fixing the remaining issues! > >> > >> Matthias > >> > >> [1] > >> > https://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/pkgreport.cgi?tag=python3.9;users=debian-python@lists.debian.org > >> [2] https://release.debian.org/transitions/html/python3.9.html > > > > Going on with a test rebuild of 3.9 as default to file bug reports for > more > > packages. The first stage1 packages for 3.9 as default [1] can be found > at > > > > deb [trusted=yes] http://people.debian.org/~doko/tmp/python3.9 ./ > > deb [trusted=yes] http://people.debian.org/~ginggs/python3.9-repo ./ > > > > The first repo just having the python3-defaults packages from > experimental. The > > second repo of course will be outdated very soon ... Bug reports for > stage1 are > > filed, Graham is now running the test builds for stage2. > > > > The autopkg test results at [2] need checking. There's currently a > britney bug > > which marks things as bad, and only gets it right after a week. Plus > there's no > > way to select an "unrelated" package from unstable for a test, and have > it > > marked as a successful test. So basically you need to wait until all > the 3.9 > > related fixes migrate to testing for running a successful autopkg test. > > > > Matthias > > > > [1] https://release.debian.org/transitions/html/python3.9-default.html > > [2] https://tracker.debian.org/pkg/python3-defaults > > - python3-defaults now migrated to testing. The following packages were > removed from testing with fastened hints. > > numba > python-executing > python-fabio > python-icecream > python-molotov > supysonic > > - The Python related ftbfs issues from the last archive test rebuild > were user-tagged with 'python3.9', although I didn't make much > effort to determine if these are ftbfs seen for 3.9 only, or for > both 3.8 and 3.9. dh-python now supports building and testing for > all supported python version before bailing out in case of errors, > but this came too late for the test rebuild. > > issues for key packages (those with lots of dependencies) are: > > https://bugs.debian.org/973056 src:sphinx-tabs > Fixed. > https://bugs.debian.org/973057 src:python-py > Fixed. > https://bugs.debian.org/973061 src:nototools > Pasted a trivial fix to the bug. I guess it could be NMUed (it's not a Python team package). > https://bugs.debian.org/973072 src:python-kubernetes > I patched the failures (see the bug) but then the build hangs for me. > https://bugs.debian.org/973087 src:python-fs > Fixed, but I forgot to put the Closes: #xxx in the changelog. > https://bugs.debian.org/973114 src:python-future > https://bugs.debian.org/973121 src:cairocffi > https://bugs.debian.org/973126 src:responses > https://bugs.debian.org/973134 src:python-webob > https://bugs.debian.org/973165 src:pyflakes > Fixed. > https://bugs.debian.org/973167 src:ufonormalizer > https://bugs.debian.org/973168 src:pylint > This looks confusing! Upstream is thinking about it but I'm not sure what their ETA is. > https://bugs.debian.org/973193 src:parso > https://bugs.debian.org/973195 src:python-asyncssh > https://bugs.debian.org/973239 src:python-fixtures > Upstream is thinking about this too. Cheers, mwh > For the other ftbfs, see [1]. > > Matthias > > [1] > > https://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/pkgreport.cgi?tag=python3.9;users=debian-python@lists.debian.org > > --00000000000058edbf05b3cb8a72 Content-Type: text/html; charset="UTF-8" Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable


=
On Mon, 9 Nov 2020 at 22:20, Matthias= Klose <doko@debian.org> wrote= :
On 10/23/20 1:= 07 PM, Matthias Klose wrote:
> On 10/18/20 12:13 PM, Matthias Klose wrote:
>> Python 3.9 as a supported Python3 version is now in unstable, and = all binNMUs
>> are done (thanks to Graham for the work).=C2=A0 =C2=A0Bug reports = should be all filed for
>> all known problems [1], and the current state of the 3.9 addition = can be seen at
>> [2] (a few of the "bad" are false packages with b-d n py= thon3-all-dev, but not
>> building for 3.9, bug reports also filed).
>>
>> The major outstanding issue is the pandas stack, all other problem= s are found in
>> leaf packages (leaf in the sense of that no other package for the = 3.9 addition
>> is blocked).
>>
>> Please help fixing the remaining issues!
>>
>> Matthias
>>
>> [1]
>> https://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/pkgreport.cgi?tag=3Dpython3.9;user= s=3Ddebian-python@lists.debian.org
>> [2] https://release.debian.org/tr= ansitions/html/python3.9.html
>
> Going on with a test rebuild of 3.9 as default to file bug reports for= more
> packages.=C2=A0 The first stage1 packages for 3.9 as default [1] can b= e found at
>
>=C2=A0 =C2=A0deb [trusted=3Dyes] http://people.debia= n.org/~doko/tmp/python3.9 ./
>=C2=A0 =C2=A0deb [trusted=3Dyes] http://people.de= bian.org/~ginggs/python3.9-repo ./
>
> The first repo just having the python3-defaults packages from experime= ntal. The
> second repo of course will be outdated very soon ...=C2=A0 Bug reports= for stage1 are
> filed, Graham is now running the test builds for stage2.
>
> The autopkg test results at [2] need checking. There's currently a= britney bug
> which marks things as bad, and only gets it right after a week. Plus t= here's no
> way to select an "unrelated" package from unstable for a tes= t, and have it
> marked as a successful test.=C2=A0 So basically you need to wait until= all the 3.9
> related fixes migrate to testing for running a successful autopkg test= .
>
> Matthias
>
> [1] https://release.debian.or= g/transitions/html/python3.9-default.html
> [2] https://tracker.debian.org/pkg/python3-defau= lts

=C2=A0- python3-defaults now migrated to testing.=C2=A0 The following packa= ges were
=C2=A0 =C2=A0removed from testing with fastened hints.

=C2=A0 =C2=A0numba
=C2=A0 =C2=A0python-executing
=C2=A0 =C2=A0python-fabio
=C2=A0 =C2=A0python-icecream
=C2=A0 =C2=A0python-molotov
=C2=A0 =C2=A0supysonic

=C2=A0- The Python related ftbfs issues from the last archive test rebuild<= br> =C2=A0 =C2=A0were user-tagged with 'python3.9', although I didn'= ;t make much
=C2=A0 =C2=A0effort to determine if these are ftbfs seen for 3.9 only, or f= or
=C2=A0 =C2=A0both 3.8 and 3.9.=C2=A0 dh-python now supports building and te= sting for
=C2=A0 =C2=A0all supported python version before bailing out in case of err= ors,
=C2=A0 =C2=A0but this came too late for the test rebuild.

=C2=A0 =C2=A0issues for key packages (those with lots of dependencies) are:=

=C2=A0 =C2=A0 https://bugs.debian.org/973056 src:sphinx-tabs

Fixed.
=C2=A0
=C2=A0 =C2=A0 https://bugs.debian.org/973057 src:python-py

Fixed.
=C2=A0
=C2=A0 =C2=A0 https://bugs.debian.org/973061 src:nototools

Pasted a trivial fix to the bug. I guess it co= uld be NMUed=C2=A0(it's not a Python team package).
=C2=A0
=C2=A0 =C2=A0 https://bugs.debian.org/973072 src:python-kubernetes=

I patched the failures (see the bug) b= ut then the build hangs for me.
=C2=A0
=C2=A0 =C2=A0 https://bugs.debian.org/973087 src:python-fs

Fixed, but I forgot to put the Closes: #xxx in= the changelog.
=C2=A0
=C2=A0 =C2=A0 https://bugs.debian.org/973114 src:python-future
=C2=A0 =C2=A0 https://bugs.debian.org/973121 src:cairocffi
=C2=A0 =C2=A0 https://bugs.debian.org/973126 src:responses
=C2=A0 =C2=A0 https://bugs.debian.org/973134 src:python-webob
=C2=A0 =C2=A0 https://bugs.debian.org/973165 src:pyflakes

Fixed.
=C2=A0
=C2=A0 =C2=A0 https://bugs.debian.org/973167 src:ufonormalizer
=C2=A0 =C2=A0 https://bugs.debian.org/973168 src:pylint

This looks confusing! Upstream is thinking about = it but I'm not sure what their ETA is.
=C2=A0
=C2=A0 =C2=A0 https://bugs.debian.org/973193 src:parso
=C2=A0 =C2=A0 https://bugs.debian.org/973195 src:python-asyncssh =C2=A0 =C2=A0 https://bugs.debian.org/973239 src:python-fixtures

Upstream is thinking about this too.

Cheers,
mwh
=C2=A0
=C2=A0 =C2=A0For the other ftbfs, see [1].

Matthias

[1]
= https://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/pkgreport.cgi?tag=3Dpython3.9;users=3Ddebia= n-python@lists.debian.org

--00000000000058edbf05b3cb8a72--