Path: csiph.com!news.mixmin.net!aioe.org!bofh.it!news.nic.it!robomod From: Lucas Nussbaum Newsgroups: linux.debian.bugs.dist,linux.debian.maint.python Subject: Bug#959631: hy: FTBFS: dh_auto_test: error: pybuild --test --test-pytest -i python{version} -p 3.8 returned exit code 13 Date: Sun, 21 Jun 2020 22:10:10 +0200 Message-ID: References: X-Mailbox-Line: From debian-bugs-dist-request@lists.debian.org Sun Jun 21 20:04:30 2020 Old-Return-Path: X-Spam-Flag: NO X-Spam-Score: -0.7 Reply-To: Lucas Nussbaum , 959631@bugs.debian.org Resent-To: debian-bugs-dist@lists.debian.org Resent-Cc: Tianon Gravi X-Debian-Pr-Message: followup 959631 X-Debian-Pr-Package: src:hy X-Debian-Pr-Keywords: bullseye ftbfs sid X-Debian-Pr-Source: hy X-Spam-Bayes: score:0.0000 Tokens: new, 7; hammy, 146; neutral, 59; spammy, 4. spammytokens:0.962-+--H*r:smtp, 0.950-+--our, 0.931-+--today, 0.909-+--limited hammytokens:0.000-+--H*UA:1.10.1, 0.000-+--H*u:1.10.1, 0.000-+--H*UA:2018-07-13, 0.000-+--H*u:2018-07-13, 0.000-+--H*RU:178.79.145.134 MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline User-Agent: Mutt/1.10.1 (2018-07-13) X-Debian-Message: from BTS X-Mailing-List: archive/latest/1609556 List-ID: List-URL: Approved: robomod@news.nic.it Lines: 27 Organization: linux.* mail to news gateway Sender: robomod@news.nic.it X-Original-Cc: 959631@bugs.debian.org, Debian Python X-Original-Date: Sun, 21 Jun 2020 21:58:53 +0200 X-Original-Message-ID: <20200621195853.GB25377@xanadu.blop.info> X-Original-References: <20200503125455.GA32299@xanadu.blop.info> <20200503125455.GA32299@xanadu.blop.info> Xref: csiph.com linux.debian.bugs.dist:1014739 linux.debian.maint.python:12668 On 15/05/20 at 11:18 -0700, Tianon Gravi wrote: > On Tue, 5 May 2020 at 10:55, Tianon Gravi wrote: > > I was definitely over my head with this one, so I reached out to the > > Hy community and was pointed to https://bugs.python.org/issue39562, > > which does seem quite related from my own limited understanding, so > > this might technically be a bug in the Python package? > > > > I'm including the Debian Python list on CC to hopefully see if someone > > there can provide some assistance figuring out what's necessary here. > > O:) > > Looking at results from ci.debian.net[1], our autopkgtests failed on > 2020-05-07 and passed today (2020-05-15). Comparing the logs, it > appears the difference is that the last failing build was against > python3.8 version 3.8.3~rc1-1, and the successful build from today was > against python3.8 version 3.8.3-1 (lending credence to the thought it > was probably a Python bug, and that it's now fixed). > > [1]: https://ci.debian.net/packages/h/hy/ > > Can you re-test and verify that we no longer FTBFS in your testing? O:) Hi, Sorry for the delay. I confirm it builds fine now. Lucas