Path: csiph.com!aioe.org!bofh.it!news.nic.it!robomod From: Antoine =?UTF-8?Q?Beaupr=C3=A9?= Newsgroups: linux.debian.bugs.dist,linux.debian.kernel Subject: Bug#860264: similar bug with sshfs, maybe in systemd/ifupdown Date: Wed, 30 Jan 2019 04:10:01 +0100 Message-ID: References: X-Mailbox-Line: From debian-bugs-dist-request@lists.debian.org Wed Jan 30 03:03:09 2019 Old-Return-Path: X-Spam-Flag: NO X-Spam-Score: -4.2 Reply-To: Antoine =?UTF-8?Q?Beaupr=C3=A9?= , 860264@bugs.debian.org Resent-To: debian-bugs-dist@lists.debian.org Resent-Cc: Debian kernel team X-Debian-Pr-Message: followup 860264 X-Debian-Pr-Package: nfs-kernel-server X-Debian-Pr-Source: nfs-utils X-Spam-Bayes: score:0.0000 Tokens: new, 7; hammy, 122; neutral, 52; spammy, 1. spammytokens:0.916-+--age hammytokens:0.000-+--H*o:Debian, 0.000-+--Hx-spam-relays-external:sk:anarcat, 0.000-+--Hx-spam-relays-external:marcos.anarc.at, 0.000-+--H*r:marcos.anarc.at, 0.000-+--H*RU:marcos.anarc.at Organization: Debian MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain X-Debian-Message: from BTS X-Mailing-List: archive/latest/1517020 List-ID: List-URL: Approved: robomod@news.nic.it Lines: 32 Sender: robomod@news.nic.it X-Original-Cc: 860264@bugs.debian.org X-Original-Date: Tue, 29 Jan 2019 22:00:02 -0500 X-Original-Message-ID: <87h8dqn93h.fsf@curie.anarc.at> X-Original-References: <20190130022652.GA15542@curie.anarc.at> <149210787426.4795.532048716990473168.reportbug@wooledg.eeg.ccf.org> Xref: csiph.com linux.debian.bugs.dist:942026 linux.debian.kernel:63196 On 2019-01-29 21:32:24, Gabriel Filion wrote: > Hi there, > > On 2019-01-29 9:26 p.m., Antoine Beaupre wrote: >> We'd need an easier way to reproduce this however. Has anyone worked on >> getting some virtual machine images up to try and orchestrate a >> reproducer for this? That would be ideal but a step-by-step set of >> minimal instructions starting from a clean install would be an >> acceptable compromise. > > The bug is hard to reproduce since it's a run condition that might not > happen sometimes. It's pretty reliable on the vero 4k+, for what that's worth. But it's a slower ARM machine... > The simplest way to reproduce is to have an nfs (or maybe sshfs if it's > possible to reproduce with this) server, then on a buster machine to add > the nfs mount as a line to the fstab file, then reboot. > > when the mount does not work, it is quite apparent: the boot process > hangs for some time before NFS decides to timeout. understood. do you think it would be possible to setup a vagrant box with this somehow? a -- From the age of uniformity, from the age of solitude, from the age of Big Brother, from the age of doublethink - greetings! - Winston Smith, 1984