Path: csiph.com!fu-berlin.de!bofh.it!news.nic.it!robomod From: Diederik de Haas Newsgroups: linux.debian.kernel Subject: Re: Contacting Debian Kernel team Date: Mon, 20 May 2024 13:20:01 +0200 Message-ID: References: X-Original-To: debian-kernel@lists.debian.org X-Mailbox-Line: From debian-kernel-request@lists.debian.org Mon May 20 11:13:46 2024 Old-Return-Path: X-Amavis-Spam-Status: No, score=-12.1 tagged_above=-10000 required=5.3 tests=[BAYES_00=-2, DKIM_SIGNED=0.1, DKIM_VALID=-0.1, DKIM_VALID_AU=-0.1, DKIM_VALID_EF=-0.1, FOURLA=0.1, LDO_WHITELIST=-5, PGPSIGNATURE=-5] autolearn=ham autolearn_force=no X-Policyd-Weight: NOT_IN_SBL_XBL_SPAMHAUS=-1.5 CL_IP_EQ_HELO_IP=-2 (check from: .cknow. - helo: .out-172.mta0.migadu. - helo-domain: .migadu.) FROM/MX_MATCHES_HELO(DOMAIN)=-2; rate: -5.5 X-Greylist: delayed 385 seconds by postgrey-1.36 at bendel; Mon, 20 May 2024 11:13:32 UTC Old-X-Envelope-To: debian-kernel@lists.debian.org X-Report-Abuse: Please report any abuse attempt to abuse@migadu.com and include these headers. Organization: Connecting Knowledge MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: multipart/signed; boundary="nextPart6804796.0diqSqWF7P"; micalg="pgp-sha256"; protocol="application/pgp-signature" X-Migadu-Flow: FLOW_OUT X-Mailing-List: archive/latest/142682 List-ID: List-URL: List-Archive: https://lists.debian.org/msgid-search/4420264.o0P6YSW2xc@bagend Approved: robomod@news.nic.it Lines: 56 Sender: robomod@news.nic.it X-Original-Date: Mon, 20 May 2024 13:06:52 +0200 X-Original-Message-ID: <4420264.o0P6YSW2xc@bagend> X-Original-References: Xref: csiph.com linux.debian.kernel:82502 --nextPart6804796.0diqSqWF7P Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7Bit Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii"; protected-headers="v1" From: Diederik de Haas To: debian-kernel@lists.debian.org Subject: Re: Contacting Debian Kernel team Date: Mon, 20 May 2024 13:06:52 +0200 Message-ID: <4420264.o0P6YSW2xc@bagend> Organization: Connecting Knowledge MIME-Version: 1.0 On Monday, 20 May 2024 12:41:48 CEST Ben Hutchings wrote: > > - Can I do anything for you? > > My top priority would be more computing resources for Salsa, and > particularly for CI runners. +1 That was the first thing that came to my mind too, but it felt out of place for me to suggest that. I've less problems giving a '+1' on a suggestion from someone like Ben. >From "Salsa stats for the curious" on debian-project ML: On Friday, 12 April 2024 17:32:04 CEST Joerg Jaspert wrote: > The VM this all runs on has 8 cores and 32g I had several thoughts about that: - The PC on which I'm typing this email has twice the resources - It's impressive that the whole of Salsa can run on that - But why doesn't have f.e. 4x or 8x those resources? I think Salsa is great and I'm a big fan of CI. But IMO Salsa isn't exactly fast and particularly running the CI pipelines takes (way) longer then I'd like. The major value of a CI is in providing a fast feedback loop. Not hindered by any knowledge in this specific area, this seems an area where throwing money at it will actually help. Possibly substantially. Cheers, Diederik --nextPart6804796.0diqSqWF7P Content-Type: application/pgp-signature; name="signature.asc" Content-Description: This is a digitally signed message part. Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7Bit -----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE----- iHUEABYIAB0WIQT1sUPBYsyGmi4usy/XblvOeH7bbgUCZksuzAAKCRDXblvOeH7b bl69AQD8QPeFECdyFbpj62svSM03fPmoyqxPMIdp7JQ26hnxCQEAtpCfz+I6xBul V1l4HUxAjqKZ3oKSukyNz14gmxP1mgI= =kNzP -----END PGP SIGNATURE----- --nextPart6804796.0diqSqWF7P--