Path: csiph.com!fu-berlin.de!bofh.it!news.nic.it!robomod From: Andrey Rakhmatullin Newsgroups: linux.debian.devel Subject: Re: How painful is a lib(fuse) .so version bump for a distribution Date: Wed, 25 Sep 2024 22:40:02 +0200 Message-ID: References: X-Original-To: debian-devel@lists.debian.org X-Mailbox-Line: From debian-devel-request@lists.debian.org Wed Sep 25 20:31:32 2024 Old-Return-Path: X-Amavis-Spam-Status: No, score=-12 tagged_above=-10000 required=5.3 tests=[BAYES_00=-2, DKIM_SIGNED=0.1, DKIM_VALID=-0.1, LDO_WHITELIST=-5, PGPSIGNATURE=-5] autolearn=ham autolearn_force=no X-Policyd-Weight: using cached result; rate: -3.5 MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: multipart/signed; micalg=pgp-sha512; protocol="application/pgp-signature"; boundary="S8DuwlOvDJ74BE+W" Content-Disposition: inline X-Mailing-List: archive/latest/361920 List-ID: List-URL: List-Archive: https://lists.debian.org/msgid-search/ZvRzFLTpYWRLKZ7K@belkar.wrar.name Approved: robomod@news.nic.it Lines: 44 Organization: linux.* mail to news gateway Sender: robomod@news.nic.it X-Original-Date: Thu, 26 Sep 2024 01:31:16 +0500 X-Original-Message-ID: X-Original-References: <6a857931-e967-4140-b554-626c8df7bd40@fastmail.fm> Xref: csiph.com linux.debian.devel:113509 --S8DuwlOvDJ74BE+W Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8 Content-Disposition: inline Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable On Wed, Sep 25, 2024 at 09:38:26PM +0200, Bernd Schubert wrote: > I would like to ask how painful is a library (libfuse) .so for a > distribution? Not at all, if all revdeps build fine with the bumped version. "I'm assuming that distributions do not recompile packages against a new library version, unless absolutely needed - if I'm right library ABI changes cause silent issues." sounds very wrong to me. We always recompile packages against a new soname when that is uploaded, and as we try to keep packages uptodate a new soname is normally uploaded every time it's bumped by the upstream. --=20 WBR, wRAR --S8DuwlOvDJ74BE+W Content-Type: application/pgp-signature; name="signature.asc" -----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE----- iQJhBAABCgBLFiEEolIP6gqGcKZh3YxVM2L3AxpJkuEFAmb0cxQtFIAAAAAAFQAP cGthLWFkZHJlc3NAZ251cGcub3Jnd3JhckBkZWJpYW4ub3JnAAoJEDNi9wMaSZLh dbkQAKnW9WeZKaIR+s3Eah2f0b5kcEg8MkL4CLR6arH8B53zSWpGWfR1Y9m1AlbL fhQoptEkIORtpORnDdywQYJQYtEyy+HddvjCDq7OOd355YeTw6+v0ambNV5Jj5uJ bvzp2E1oV8Tp5aVn4NeMthBwroJb+yU0FD8NGRMPe6sLUyOPejkAHiJaZiH9j4w5 I04MHvNWFHcFD4/lBWfDixXq7xPzceTA9Nd+rXxPgNDXZNllBytcAPgDx2EYoIMD jq81/1Bcmgslm4bQDQLPmqgcM67eeKAt8IhqV9ZAVkoAWW8IxI2iix+bEf+yEjy7 BzPXOVWCs1Xb6IcIK7cLE06BNiWMGEaMG0t/Z/CT+Ib6tg/qI6npbypQnBRNq7YI 0M9BZLzSnNjz1nQklXGZOHr3yINUIbFJvQIkFmAlyBJg3kgOE8Ad6HSAbKdHw9ba TFajj6bOMp2ZaluklcTnVJ2zbvwUzrzOZA4HpCCiM4w8sCksjvVU/OTlNRuQGQhp 39N4shJ2aRY0o0b5ZN+zFOH/08CK6vf+S4TTF7Bkxc8xDDwTtCXuouioZSFBVa/u FCOQW0qoiSa+ikdiNPFQYBuscZT80z0eLWsZJeuZAvo8M1i2uYnXSL6U5IQ++vb1 JNc6oKUuBpekDjKI/NhRJYgBoLRiaOurII9HnBymhGK82Fol =FXjK -----END PGP SIGNATURE----- --S8DuwlOvDJ74BE+W--