Path: csiph.com!aioe.org!bofh.it!news.nic.it!robomod
From: Pascal Vibet - ADACIS <pvibet@gmail.com>
Newsgroups: linux.debian.bugs.dist
Subject: Bug#903641: Preserve numlock state during cryptdisk boot password prompt in plymouth
Date: Thu, 12 Jul 2018 20:00:01 +0200
Message-ID: <waO2J-2GP-9@gated-at.bofh.it>
References: <waJw6-fD-21@gated-at.bofh.it> <waKit-v1-7@gated-at.bofh.it> <waJw6-fD-21@gated-at.bofh.it> <waKit-v1-7@gated-at.bofh.it>
Old-Return-Path: <debbugs@buxtehude.debian.org>
Reply-To: Pascal Vibet - ADACIS <pvibet@gmail.com>, 903641@bugs.debian.org
Resent-To: debian-bugs-dist@lists.debian.org
Resent-Cc: Debian Cryptsetup Team <pkg-cryptsetup-devel@alioth-lists.debian.net>
User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (X11; Linux x86_64; rv:52.0) Gecko/20100101 Thunderbird/52.9.1
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: multipart/alternative; boundary="------------1F89A8556C552AC1AECB9413"
Content-Language: en-US
Approved: robomod@news.nic.it
Lines: 125
Organization: linux.* mail to news gateway
Sender: robomod@news.nic.it
Xref: csiph.com linux.debian.bugs.dist:907448

This is a multi-part message in MIME format.
--------------1F89A8556C552AC1AECB9413
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8; format=flowed
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit

Hi,

Le 12/07/2018 à 15:48, Guilhem Moulin a écrit :
> Why only in cryptopensc and not in cryptroot?  Also /usr/bin/setleds
> comes from the ‘kbd’ package which cryptsetup-initramfs doesn't depend
> on (it's only a Recommends, not a hard Depends), so `copy_exec` needs to
> wrapped to check for the program's existence.
Because i don't test with cryptroot. For package depends or Recommends, 
the /usr/share/initramfs-tools/hooks/cryptopensc script need 
'dpkg-architecture' program to work and it is in 'dpkg-dev' package||.

But you are right, 'setleds'  is not the goods choice to keep numlock state.
I will search a better program.

Regards

Le 12/07/2018 à 15:48, Guilhem Moulin a écrit :
> Control: severity -1 minor
>
> Hi,
>
> On Thu, 12 Jul 2018 at 15:02:20 +0200, Pascal Vibet - ADACIS wrote:
>> So, i apply modifications like this:
>> in /usr/share/initramfs-tools/hooks/cryptopensc:
>> […]
>> in /usr/share/initramfs-tools/scripts/local-top/cryptopensc:
> Why only in cryptopensc and not in cryptroot?  Also /usr/bin/setleds
> comes from the ‘kbd’ package which cryptsetup-initramfs doesn't depend
> on (it's only a Recommends, not a hard Depends), so `copy_exec` needs to
> wrapped to check for the program's existence.
>
>>> INITTY=/dev/tty[1-8]
>>> for tty in $INITTY ; do
>>>      setleds -D +num < $tty
>>> done
> Does that really *preserve* the numlock state?  I'm not familiar with
> setleds(1), but according to the manpage it *sets* numlock and changes
> the default settings.
>
> Cheers,


--------------1F89A8556C552AC1AECB9413
Content-Type: text/html; charset=utf-8
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit

<html>
  <head>
    <meta http-equiv="Content-Type" content="text/html; charset=utf-8">
  </head>
  <body text="#000000" bgcolor="#FFFFFF">
    <p>Hi,</p>
    <div class="moz-cite-prefix">Le 12/07/2018 à 15:48, Guilhem Moulin a
      écrit :</div>
    <blockquote type="cite"
      cite="mid:20180712134820.GA2525@localhost.localdomain">
      <pre wrap="">Why only in cryptopensc and not in cryptroot?  Also /usr/bin/setleds
comes from the ‘kbd’ package which cryptsetup-initramfs doesn't depend
on (it's only a Recommends, not a hard Depends), so `copy_exec` needs to
wrapped to check for the program's existence.
</pre>
    </blockquote>
    Because i don't test with cryptroot. For package depends or
    Recommends, the /usr/share/initramfs-tools/hooks/cryptopensc script
    need 'dpkg-architecture' program to work and it is in 'dpkg-dev'
    package<span class="comment-copy"><code></code></span>.<br>
    <br>
    But you are right, 'setleds'  is not the goods choice to keep
    numlock state.<br>
    I will search a better program.<br>
    <br>
    Regards<br>
    <br>
    <div class="moz-cite-prefix">Le 12/07/2018 à 15:48, Guilhem Moulin a
      écrit :<br>
    </div>
    <blockquote type="cite"
      cite="mid:20180712134820.GA2525@localhost.localdomain">
      <pre wrap="">Control: severity -1 minor

Hi,

On Thu, 12 Jul 2018 at 15:02:20 +0200, Pascal Vibet - ADACIS wrote:
</pre>
      <blockquote type="cite">
        <pre wrap="">So, i apply modifications like this:
in /usr/share/initramfs-tools/hooks/cryptopensc:
[…]
in /usr/share/initramfs-tools/scripts/local-top/cryptopensc:
</pre>
      </blockquote>
      <pre wrap="">
Why only in cryptopensc and not in cryptroot?  Also /usr/bin/setleds
comes from the ‘kbd’ package which cryptsetup-initramfs doesn't depend
on (it's only a Recommends, not a hard Depends), so `copy_exec` needs to
wrapped to check for the program's existence.

</pre>
      <blockquote type="cite">
        <blockquote type="cite">
          <pre wrap="">INITTY=/dev/tty[1-8]
for tty in $INITTY ; do
    setleds -D +num &lt; $tty
done
</pre>
        </blockquote>
      </blockquote>
      <pre wrap="">
Does that really *preserve* the numlock state?  I'm not familiar with
setleds(1), but according to the manpage it *sets* numlock and changes
the default settings.

Cheers,
</pre>
    </blockquote>
    <br>
  </body>
</html>

--------------1F89A8556C552AC1AECB9413--