Path: csiph.com!aioe.org!bofh.it!news.nic.it!robomod From: Ben Hutchings Newsgroups: linux.debian.bugs.dist Subject: Bug#855074: RFP: installer -- [SHORT DESCRIPTION] Date: Mon, 13 Feb 2017 22:50:02 +0100 Message-ID: References: X-Original-To: Rolf Heinrichs , 855074@bugs.debian.org X-Mailbox-Line: From debian-bugs-dist-request@lists.debian.org Mon Feb 13 21:48:08 2017 Old-Return-Path: X-Spam-Flag: NO X-Spam-Score: -7.398 Reply-To: Ben Hutchings , 855074@bugs.debian.org Resent-To: debian-bugs-dist@lists.debian.org Resent-Cc: wnpp@debian.org X-Debian-Pr-Message: followup 855074 X-Debian-Pr-Package: wnpp X-Spam-Bayes: score:0.0000 Tokens: new, 17; hammy, 149; neutral, 179; spammy, 1. spammytokens:0.998-1--Crosscheck hammytokens:0.000-+--H*c:pgp-sha512, 0.000-+--H*F:D*decadent.org.uk, 0.000-+--xdebbugscc, 0.000-+--x-debbugs-cc, 0.000-+--H*RU:sk:shadbol Content-Type: multipart/signed; micalg="pgp-sha512"; protocol="application/pgp-signature"; boundary="=-qwS0xzK2tbAi1B+ZDaQy" X-Mailer: Evolution 3.22.4-1 MIME-Version: 1.0 X-Sa-Exim-Connect-IP: 2a02:8011:400e:2:6f00:88c8:c921:d332 X-Sa-Exim-Mail-From: ben@decadent.org.uk X-Sa-Exim-Scanned: No (on shadbolt.decadent.org.uk); SAEximRunCond expanded to false X-Debian-Message: from BTS X-Mailing-List: archive/latest/1354869 List-ID: List-URL: Approved: robomod@news.nic.it Lines: 97 Organization: linux.* mail to news gateway Sender: robomod@news.nic.it X-Original-Date: Mon, 13 Feb 2017 21:45:50 +0000 X-Original-Message-ID: <1487022350.2900.84.camel@decadent.org.uk> X-Original-References: <1487019504.8326.1.camel@rh030> Xref: csiph.com linux.debian.bugs.dist:807287 --=-qwS0xzK2tbAi1B+ZDaQy Content-Type: text/plain; charset="UTF-8" Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable Control: reassign -1 installation-reports Control: retitle -1 installation-reports: Debian 7.9 - wrong keymap active = in initramfs Control: tag -1 moreinfo On Mon, 2017-02-13 at 21:58 +0100, Rolf Heinrichs wrote: > Package: wnpp This is a bug category for planning new Debian packages or transferring maintainership of package, not for bugs in existing packages. In future, try to work out which package the bug is in, or use 'installation-reports' for bugs that appear on installation. > Severity: wishlist > X-Debbugs-CC: debian-devel@lists.debian.org >=20 > --- Please fill out the fields below. --- >=20 > =C2=A0=C2=A0=C2=A0Package name: installer > =C2=A0=C2=A0=C2=A0=C2=A0=C2=A0=C2=A0=C2=A0=C2=A0Version: Wheezy > Upstream Author: [NAME ] > =C2=A0=C2=A0=C2=A0=C2=A0=C2=A0=C2=A0=C2=A0=C2=A0=C2=A0=C2=A0=C2=A0=C2=A0U= RL: [http://example.com] > =C2=A0=C2=A0=C2=A0=C2=A0=C2=A0=C2=A0=C2=A0=C2=A0License: [GPL, LGPL, BSD,= MIT/X, etc.] > =C2=A0=C2=A0=C2=A0=C2=A0Description: [DESCRIPTION] >=20 >=20 > Wheezy amd64 7.9.0 DVD, setup with graphical installer, using Germany as > country, a German keyboard and setup of an encrypted drive: after boot > the complex key for decrypting the drive is not accepted by the > initramfs. The key contains special characters like capital letters and > characters like ~{[| that require a key combination with ALT GR on the > German keyboard.=C2=A0 >=20 > Also in the maintenance console, you cannot enter caps or special > characters.=C2=A0=C2=A0 This sounds similar to , which affects use with console-tools. In the rescue shell, please check whether these files exist: - /bin/loadkeys - /etc/boottime.kmap.gz Also please try using the installer's rescue mode to start a shell in the installed system, and report the output of these commands: - grep KEYMAP=3D /etc/initramfs-tools/initramfs.conf - dpkg-query -W console-tools - dpkg-query -W kbd > Crosscheck was done with graphical installer and a simple key that did > not require caps or ALT GR: key is accepted. The complex key worked fine > when using the default CLI installer. >=20 > Looks like the graphical installer does not set the correct keymap.=C2=A0= =C2=A0 There is only one installer, with these two different interface modes.=20 So it's hard to imagine why the behaviour of the installed system would differ. Ben. --=20 Ben Hutchings For every complex problem there is a solution that is simple, neat, and wrong. --=-qwS0xzK2tbAi1B+ZDaQy Content-Type: application/pgp-signature; name="signature.asc" Content-Description: This is a digitally signed message part -----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE----- iQIzBAABCgAdFiEErCspvTSmr92z9o8157/I7JWGEQkFAliiKQ4ACgkQ57/I7JWG EQmYNg/9FMbF6990R9qgADIAbr94JDAeP2vuhRVY90NPUOMYm4qohq1UJLYag15s dJBgcT2LtzkY86hFfgxUXV/Kd6MIyg5FZ3ge25pRGILonNxbn06teZAFPspNXyRY ggbyIVOndjJ0MUcElOcMLRyTrsj1MlCay9BxUKX3LTaGNVC4ZpZf3ucZue2Rdkjh vpq1bSLYQNgwkrhiu0c4jb+fdpouHidY4VZXafvzJBU21kP+4SH2DYxV6n0yuZ/T U0sMe4jqSoIG2cwK63lgqF6dlkGsPBCeBghYu6xld2EOQbDNTKk6uhTDDQNQdxCY CQpPrudEPWYQkNoxu2OaYhtZm6rPAElCzDDG+G+oBRbpS+g1PAhSi2cf6IL1Ikpu TZmZWZySoPPrEAdSOOyY6DebrqU4tBNlytzkTspyXHM4DTD+KsuRBl67Um2JPLdL j6yW9ziLdCa64+xdGVdVNgUG9EMs6P1AHpWC8MB1+HRzy8I8NL75ROG6rDqcIdzn xtDbMVX2QZ85OiqZx6OQBTHkCL0SAjheNt7WSl03spDGVcJ8qOlR7Yx1YZZd3Lbc psbQgyRFmIV5DuKKgHxR6ISFyOMaWgm/e6HZ5jRGB6Yh3GqhsONmVpjlzF+oT5ga epuH1MVd1LnpYSFtud1zVDMdv/3rSBHm+u0SXLGKztmliUXqpzM= =nuDK -----END PGP SIGNATURE----- --=-qwS0xzK2tbAi1B+ZDaQy--