Path: csiph.com!fu-berlin.de!bofh.it!news.nic.it!robomod From: Vincent Lefevre Newsgroups: linux.debian.bugs.dist,linux.debian.kernel Subject: Bug#1055931: apt ignores bullseye-backports Date: Thu, 16 Nov 2023 18:10:02 +0100 Message-ID: References: X-Mailbox-Line: From debian-bugs-dist-request@lists.debian.org Thu Nov 16 17:06:17 2023 Old-Return-Path: X-Spam-Flag: NO X-Spam-Score: -2.362 Reply-To: Vincent Lefevre , 1055931@bugs.debian.org Resent-To: debian-bugs-dist@lists.debian.org Resent-Cc: Debian Kernel Team X-Debian-Pr-Message: followup 1055931 X-Debian-Pr-Package: src:linux X-Debian-Pr-Source: linux MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=iso-8859-1 Content-Disposition: inline Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit X-Mailer-Info: https://www.vinc17.net/mutt/ User-Agent: Mutt/2.2.12+67 (757ca3b3) vl-149028 (2023-09-09) X-Debian-Message: from BTS X-Mailing-List: archive/latest/1806212 List-ID: List-URL: Approved: robomod@news.nic.it Lines: 39 Organization: linux.* mail to news gateway Sender: robomod@news.nic.it X-Original-Cc: 1055931@bugs.debian.org, Reportbug Maintainers X-Original-Date: Thu, 16 Nov 2023 18:04:50 +0100 X-Original-Message-ID: <20231116170450.GC2482@cventin.lip.ens-lyon.fr> X-Original-References: <20231114124521.GA190892@qaa.vinc17.org> <20231114135118.GA140880@zira.vinc17.org> <20231114141725.GC2930@zira.vinc17.org> <578abf33-0e21-46d9-8678-a05c81e7d2d2@mailbox.org> <20231114124521.GA190892@qaa.vinc17.org> <578abf33-0e21-46d9-8678-a05c81e7d2d2@mailbox.org> Xref: csiph.com linux.debian.bugs.dist:1175065 linux.debian.kernel:80887 Hi Nis, On 2023-11-16 17:31:13 +0100, Nis Martensen wrote: > On 14.11.2023 15.17, Vincent Lefevre wrote: > >> Checking for newer versions at madison and https://ftp-master.debian.org/new.html > >> > >> Your version (6.1.55-1) of linux-image-6.1.0-13-amd64 appears to be out of date. > >> The following newer release(s) are available in the Debian archive: > >> bullseye-backports (backports-policy): 6.1.55+1~bpo11+1 > > > So I'm wondering where this information comes from. > > I can find "6.1.55+1~bpo11+1" in https://ftp-master.debian.org/new.822 > so it must come from there. Thanks. I had first looked at https://ftp-master.debian.org/new.html (as output by reportbug), and it doesn't appear on this page (I searched for both "linux" and "6.1.55"). Note that clicking on "Click to toggle all/binary-NEW packages" does not make this kernel appear either. FYI, I later looked at https://ftp-master.debian.org/new.822 too (as I could see it in the strace output), but only searched for linux-image there, explaining that I didn't find it either (it actually appears as linux-signed-amd64). At the bottom of the new.html page: "You can also look at the RFC822 version." But why are the contents different? (linux-signed-amd64 appears only in the RFC822 version.) -- Vincent Lefèvre - Web: 100% accessible validated (X)HTML - Blog: Work: CR INRIA - computer arithmetic / AriC project (LIP, ENS-Lyon)