Path: csiph.com!fu-berlin.de!uni-berlin.de!individual.net!not-for-mail From: Hanno Foest Newsgroups: de.sci.electronics Subject: Re: More feedback re SD card access Date: Thu, 22 Oct 2015 20:19:09 +0200 Lines: 13 Message-ID: References: <6aie2bl2l56ot1j2fducofpcp431e3ii2o@4ax.com> <05kh2b5qmlnlcep7kcivp3vva9aq6bcaai@4ax.com> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=windows-1252; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit X-Trace: individual.net sAFX94CkPY4dGthtHeI8JQnwute4Vf3GnQw2utIegX1tDUaebM Cancel-Lock: sha1:WuZudVBkqkXT9CW1k6uasBMCr3E= User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (X11; Linux x86_64; rv:38.0) Gecko/20100101 Thunderbird/38.3.0 In-Reply-To: Xref: csiph.com de.sci.electronics:194765 Am 22.10.2015 um 20:02 schrieb Hans-Peter Diettrich: > Ist eigentlich an dem alten Gerücht was dran, daß damals die Monitore > "abgehört" werden konnten? Ja. Google-Begriffe TEMPEST, Van Eck phreaking. https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Tempest_(codename)#Public_research https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Van_Eck_phreaking Geht immer noch. Hanno