Path: csiph.com!eternal-september.org!feeder3.eternal-september.org!news.eternal-september.org!eternal-september.org!.POSTED!not-for-mail From: Keith Thompson Newsgroups: comp.theory Subject: Re: Incorrect requirements --- Computing the mapping from the input to HHH(DD) Date: Thu, 08 May 2025 23:17:32 -0700 Organization: None to speak of Lines: 21 Message-ID: <871psyb94z.fsf@nosuchdomain.example.com> References: <87msbmeo3b.fsf@nosuchdomain.example.com> <87a57mek8r.fsf@nosuchdomain.example.com> <87seled0zy.fsf@nosuchdomain.example.com> <87zffmbeyt.fsf@nosuchdomain.example.com> <87frhebbae.fsf@nosuchdomain.example.com> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain Injection-Date: Fri, 09 May 2025 08:17:33 +0200 (CEST) Injection-Info: dont-email.me; posting-host="302a6dd640940106301f9e87fdade96e"; logging-data="2680540"; mail-complaints-to="abuse@eternal-september.org"; posting-account="U2FsdGVkX1+9akFG0BJRRaYcSswB+bc9" User-Agent: Gnus/5.13 (Gnus v5.13) Cancel-Lock: sha1:RpRTTNoZrZXK1ctupchNgPKNDR4= sha1:9MATjdqwhU406Bd1YXxPCzG7Hmg= Xref: csiph.com comp.theory:118116 olcott writes: > On 5/9/2025 12:31 AM, Keith Thompson wrote: [...] >> You didn't respond to the above. I'll ask directly. >> Would I need to understand x86 code to understand your claims? Yes >> or no. > > It makes it much easier because the state transition graph > of the control flow at the x86 level is unequivocal. What a pity you couldn't have made that clear much sooner. As I said, I'm not very familiar with x86 code, and it's absolutely not worth my time and effort to learn it for the sake of understanding your claims. Bye. -- Keith Thompson (The_Other_Keith) Keith.S.Thompson+u@gmail.com void Void(void) { Void(); } /* The recursive call of the void */