Path: csiph.com!x330-a1.tempe.blueboxinc.net!usenet.pasdenom.info!news.albasani.net!fu-berlin.de!uni-berlin.de!individual.net!not-for-mail From: spike1@freenet.co.uk Newsgroups: comp.sys.sinclair Subject: Re: Conversion of ISO Date-stamps into Weekday Numbers Date: Wed, 30 Mar 2011 18:50:43 +0100 Organization: The league against squirrels Lines: 27 Message-ID: References: <8739m50w3a.fsf@araminta.anjou.terraraq.org.uk> X-Trace: individual.net 8kEx6mZiQeBeBGEMjSWvJQ3OEEdzQEq0KpLM9rcrr3/vqHz59H X-Orig-Path: not-for-mail Cancel-Lock: sha1:VzJlFYAdyv9MjmOPNq6LLx56VbE= User-Agent: tin/1.9.5-20091224 ("Lochruan") (UNIX) (Linux/2.6.32-30-generic (i686)) Xref: x330-a1.tempe.blueboxinc.net comp.sys.sinclair:106 And verily, didst Richard Kettlewell hastily babble thusly: > spike1@freenet.co.uk writes: >> And verily, didst Guesser hastily babble thusly: >>> On 29/03/2011 18:18, Milton Lachman wrote: >>>> >>>> 1. hijacking a thread explicitly for Sinclair BASIC ("ZX83" here) >>> >>> however you try to spin it SuperBASIC is not "Sinclair ZX BASIC" as you >>> originally posted. >> >> Indeed. It's not really even recognisable as QL SuperBASIC either. >> If it was, it'd've expanded the rems to REMarks. > > Wouldn't 'DIV8' be parsed as a single identifier rather than 'DIV 8', > too? > > (Did SuperBASIC even -have- DIV and MOD? It's been years and while I > think I still have a QL manual, it's not to hand right now.) > Has MOD iirc, but can't remember if it has DIV (which is pretty pointless really as INT(x/y) would do just as well. -- | spike1@freenet.co.uk | Windows95 (noun): 32 bit extensions and a | | | graphical shell for a 16 bit patch to an 8 bit | | Andrew Halliwell BSc | operating system originally coded for a 4 bit | | in |microprocessor, written by a 2 bit company, that| | Computer Science | can't stand 1 bit of competition. |