Path: csiph.com!fu-berlin.de!uni-berlin.de!individual.net!not-for-mail
From: TimS <timstreater@greenbee.net>
Newsgroups: comp.sys.raspberry-pi
Subject: Re: My darn NAS...
Date: 14 Jan 2021 13:10:01 GMT
Lines: 24
Message-ID: <i6au59Fe12eU22@mid.individual.net>
References: <rtgj4d$l86$1@dont-email.me> <20210113182113.5abc8464b59aee1ec444050a@eircom.net> <rtnhf6$gjc$1@dont-email.me> <VA.00000d96.00466666@me.invalid>
Mime-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8; format=fixed
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit
X-Trace: individual.net QkClm1GZ/KRsuYwX///GlgCdeNs6ljr9VgxThnckrQwHUkLffq
Cancel-Lock: sha1:tguRLP7IB6VoWqw0TsBGUZs548o=
X-No-Archive: Yes
User-Agent: Usenapp/0.97.1/l for MacOS - Full License
Xref: csiph.com comp.sys.raspberry-pi:25902

On 14 Jan 2021 at 12:58:22 GMT, Daniel James <daniel@me.invalid> wrote:

> In article <rtnhf6$gjc$1@dont-email.me>, The Natural Philosopher wrote:
>>>   Ah we have the solution - modulated X-Rays.
>> 
>>  well you may well laugh...why stop there. Gamma rays?
> 
> You do know that X-Rays and Gamma rays are essentially the same thing?
> 
> They occupy much the same part of the EM spectrum. The distinction 
> often made between them is to do with their means of production. Gamma 
> rays are produced inside the atomic nucleus while X-Rays are created by 
> relaxation of highly excited electrons outside the nucleus.
> 
> https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/X-ray#Gamma_rays

Both are ionising, so can cause radiation damage. Gamma rays are much more
energetic, however. Stuff like UV, visible light, and whatever 5G uses is not
ionising.

-- 
Tim