Path: csiph.com!fu-berlin.de!uni-berlin.de!individual.net!not-for-mail
From: Bob Martin <bob.martin@excite.com>
Newsgroups: comp.sys.raspberry-pi
Subject: Re: R Pi 0
Date: Mon, 14 Dec 2015 08:08:19 GMT
Lines: 16
Message-ID: <dd7bnjFrjbgU1@mid.individual.net>
References: <n36pn2$dps$1@dont-email.me> <n37gl4$5t8$1@dont-email.me> <n4lm98$ia0$1@dont-email.me>
X-Trace: individual.net HbAKm9MIiPAKy+0zenjPwQgF4oQJhJhzpd1r9Qbr0nd1QIJhsi
X-Orig-Path: BERLIN : news.individual.net
Cancel-Lock: sha1:LR6Qbd+LrjLj8Uf1QBfCNV/Cy2Y=
Xref: csiph.com comp.sys.raspberry-pi:10116

in 10187 20151214 060906 rickman <gnuarm@gmail.com> wrote:
>On 12/14/2015 12:28 AM, David Taylor wrote:
>> On 13/12/2015 23:57, rickman wrote:
>>> On 12/13/2015 2:56 PM, Charlie wrote:
>> []
>>>> Actually, the Pi 2B for ~$35 is a better choice, due to built in
>>>> capability, unless you have a very specific application.
>>>
>>> Why exactly is the Pi 2B better?  Do you understand what  I mean by
>>> "embedded computer"?
>>
>> Quad core and more memory.  May be faster if that matters.
>
>Only useful if you can multi-thread your application.

Nope.  Type "top" on the command line and see how many tasks are running.