Path: csiph.com!news.swapon.de!eternal-september.org!feeder.eternal-september.org!reader01.eternal-september.org!kreme.eternal-september.org!.POSTED!not-for-mail From: Lewis Newsgroups: comp.sys.mac.system Subject: Re: Trivia Pixar computers Date: Wed, 19 Aug 2020 10:11:01 -0000 (UTC) Organization: Miskatonic U Lines: 67 Message-ID: References: <7V7YG.151250$HY4.66027@fx37.iad> <100820200802254050%nospam@nospam.invalid> <170820201521093494%nospam@nospam.invalid> <190820200032159996%nospam@nospam.invalid> Injection-Date: Wed, 19 Aug 2020 10:11:01 -0000 (UTC) Injection-Info: kreme.eternal-september.org; posting-host="5d54eff76426f492c4ef015953520e37"; logging-data="9614"; mail-complaints-to="abuse@eternal-september.org"; posting-account="U2FsdGVkX1/f8lXgvB00qNc1iDhoTWQ8" User-Agent: slrn/1.0.3 (Darwin) Cancel-Lock: sha1:ujW2S4dAiy/dwQ2aRMug54Zk52Y= X-Face: )^b5"R:T7U>9~:PEn3YkzMfW*[b1qKeU.fP9C8~8HpU9}lA&6`bH1z X-Clacks-Overhead: GNU Terry Pratchett Mail-Copies-To: nobody Xref: csiph.com comp.sys.mac.system:134091 In message JF Mezei wrote: > On 2020-08-19 00:32, nospam wrote: >>> Openstep on Mach (aka: Nextstep with updated API from the Openstep >>> developments) had 0 compatibility with existing Mac applications. >> >> nobody said it did. > One of the apologists stated that Rhapsody had everything on both intel > and powerpc. No one said that. >>> However. while you claim it was always there, developped in secret, the >>> "always" is not proven. >> >> apple has publicly stated that's exactly what they did. > One needs to parse these PR statements with a legal eye. No, you are the only delusional shitbag who thinks Apple lies. You are an idiot FUDster who continued to be immune to WIDELY reported facts from multiple sources. > Apple started with OpenStep for Mach. (Nextstep). Rhapsody was really > NextStep 5. No. You are making shit up again. This is simply not true. > and I beleive OS-X Server 1 was Nexstep 5.5 More made up bullshit. > Not sure if Apple re-implemented HFS on Nextstep (it has HFS support > from circa 1992. Appletalk which had been supported by NextSTEP was not > available on Rhaosody. or OS-X Server (neither were serial ports) More bullshit. Mac OS X Server Getting Started: "MacOSX Server offers PostScript-compatible print spooling and job accounting for print jobs submitted using the Line Printer Remote (LPR) protocol, the industry-standard Transmission Control Protocol (TCP) protocol, the Windows SMB/CIFS protocol, and AppleTalk. The server supports both PostScript and non-PostScript print spooling using the Internet Printing Protocol (IPP)." I ran Mac OS X Server for several years, and yes, it supported AppleTalk. And of course, Macs have and had serial ports. What do you think the S in USB stands for? Dipshit. > What Apple has NOT said is that it ported all the MacOS bits to Intel > from day 1. What Apple HAS said is that they maintained an Intel version of the current OS X all along. -- Cause love's such an old fashioned word And love dares you to care for the people on the Edge of the night, and love dares you to change Our way of caring about ourselves, This is our last dance This is ourselves. Under Pressure.