Path: csiph.com!v102.xanadu-bbs.net!xanadu-bbs.net!nntp.club.cc.cmu.edu!micro-heart-of-gold.mit.edu!bloom-beacon.mit.edu!bloom-beacon.mit.edu!panix!MIX!Blackbird
From: billy@MIX.COM
Newsgroups: comp.sys.mac.system
Subject: Re: Dumb Question about SL server.
Date: Mon, 13 Apr 2015 23:47:43 +0000 (UTC)
Organization: PANIX Public Access Internet and UNIX, NYC
Lines: 15
Message-ID: <mghkiv$nrq$1@reader2.panix.com>
References: <agisaak.spamblock-978DA9.08152010042015@shawnews> <slrnmifr13.vn7.g.kreme@amelia.local> <agisaak.spamblock-8A59D0.10070810042015@shawnews>
NNTP-Posting-Host: panix5.panix.com
X-Trace: reader2.panix.com 1428968863 24442 166.84.1.5 (13 Apr 2015 23:47:43 GMT)
X-Complaints-To: abuse@panix.com
NNTP-Posting-Date: Mon, 13 Apr 2015 23:47:43 +0000 (UTC)
Xref: csiph.com comp.sys.mac.system:73214

Ymir <agisaak.spamblock@gmail.com> writes:

> On an unrelated note, I'm curious as to why Apple allows the server
> version to be virtualized but not the client.

That's just the way licensing for each fell, so to speak.  Apple has
not amended the OS 10.6 client license, and the virtualization vendors
are following it.  VMWare did mistakenly do a release that ran the 10.6
client, but that only lasted about four days.  Heh.

Billy Y..
-- 
        sub     #'9+1   ,r0             ; convert ascii byte
	add     #9.+1   ,r0             ; to an integer
	bcc     20$                     ; not a number