Path: csiph.com!v102.xanadu-bbs.net!xanadu-bbs.net!nntp.club.cc.cmu.edu!micro-heart-of-gold.mit.edu!bloom-beacon.mit.edu!bloom-beacon.mit.edu!panix!MIX!Blackbird From: billy@MIX.COM Newsgroups: comp.sys.mac.system Subject: Re: Yosemite or how to make OSX look like iOS :( Date: Mon, 28 Jul 2014 21:32:18 +0000 (UTC) Organization: PANIX Public Access Internet and UNIX, NYC Lines: 18 Message-ID: References: <53d41980$0$52801$742ec2ed@news.sonic.net> <280720140929313868%YourName@YourISP.com> NNTP-Posting-Host: panix5.panix.com X-Trace: reader2.panix.com 1406583138 13641 166.84.1.5 (28 Jul 2014 21:32:18 GMT) X-Complaints-To: abuse@panix.com NNTP-Posting-Date: Mon, 28 Jul 2014 21:32:18 +0000 (UTC) Xref: csiph.com comp.sys.mac.system:62531 Kevin McMurtrie writes: > "Classic" Finder was fast because it needed very little metadata. What > it did need was found in a well cached database maintained by HFS. OS X > Finder needs to hit the disk hundreds or thousands of times to collect > all the metadata for displaying folder. The technical claims for this > change are questionable. (My bet is that Apple lacked multithreading > skills needed for the original design on multi-core systems.) OS 10.3's rendering of previously created icons of 4500 image files in a folder is at least a thousand times faster than 10.9 on the same folder. Billy Y.. -- sub #'9+1 ,r0 ; convert ascii byte add #9.+1 ,r0 ; to an integer bcc 20$ ; not a number