Path: csiph.com!v102.xanadu-bbs.net!xanadu-bbs.net!news.glorb.com!usenet.stanford.edu!panix!MIX!Blackbird From: billy@MIX.COM Newsgroups: comp.sys.mac.system Subject: Re: Windows application on a Mac Date: Sun, 6 Jul 2014 00:20:15 +0000 (UTC) Organization: PANIX Public Access Internet and UNIX, NYC Lines: 26 Message-ID: References: <040720140949213663%michelle@michelle.org> <2014070414135544175-savageduck1@REMOVESPAMmecom> <040720141458205998%michelle@michelle.org> <040720141805062136%nospam@nospam.invalid> NNTP-Posting-Host: panix5.panix.com X-Trace: reader2.panix.com 1404606015 13792 166.84.1.5 (6 Jul 2014 00:20:15 GMT) X-Complaints-To: abuse@panix.com NNTP-Posting-Date: Sun, 6 Jul 2014 00:20:15 +0000 (UTC) Xref: csiph.com comp.sys.mac.system:62002 nospam writes: > but here are some things about parallels that should rule it out > as a contender: > they asked beta testers to post positive feedback That's kid stuff compared to crap like this - http://blogs.vmware.com/teamfusion/2008/04/learning-from-y.html | This blog post was inspired by a series of events that began late | last month when employees of Parallels, a company that makes a | competing solution to VMware Fusion, were found posting less-than- | flattering reviews of VMware Fusion to Amazon. | | [...] Highly recommended reading, especially for those interested in choosing a vendor with its head screwed on straight. Billy Y.. -- sub #'9+1 ,r0 ; convert ascii byte add #9.+1 ,r0 ; to an integer bcc 20$ ; not a number