Path: csiph.com!v102.xanadu-bbs.net!xanadu-bbs.net!nntp.club.cc.cmu.edu!micro-heart-of-gold.mit.edu!bloom-beacon.mit.edu!bloom-beacon.mit.edu!panix!MIX!Blackbird From: billy@MIX.COM Newsgroups: comp.sys.mac.system Subject: Re: POP3 vs. IMAP Date: Fri, 2 May 2014 18:32:01 +0000 (UTC) Organization: PANIX Public Access Internet and UNIX, NYC Lines: 17 Message-ID: References: <1lkuvlk.we7paplh2d4N%befr@eaglesoft.de> <5362d122$0$44783$862e30e2@ngroups.net> <1lkzc6u.1e2vwwswehd0N%nmassello@yahoo.com> <5363472a$0$50666$c3e8da3$92d0a893@news.astraweb.com> <53636db4$0$61294$c3e8da3$5e5e430d@news.astraweb.com> NNTP-Posting-Host: panix5.panix.com X-Trace: reader2.panix.com 1399055521 23702 166.84.1.5 (2 May 2014 18:32:01 GMT) X-Complaints-To: abuse@panix.com NNTP-Posting-Date: Fri, 2 May 2014 18:32:01 +0000 (UTC) Xref: csiph.com comp.sys.mac.system:59109 Lewis writes: > Telnet is old and terribly insecure. It has some limited usefulness to > access LAN devices that are to dumb to have ssh, but other than that it > should never be used because telent (like ftp) send cleartext passwords. Well, there is NTLM, Kerberos, ... http://tools.ietf.org/html/rfc2941 Telnet sessions, on the other hand, are not encrypted. Billy Y.. -- sub #'9+1 ,r0 ; convert ascii byte add #9.+1 ,r0 ; to an integer bcc 20$ ; not a number