Path: csiph.com!v102.xanadu-bbs.net!xanadu-bbs.net!news.glorb.com!news.linkpendium.com!news.linkpendium.com!panix!MIX!Blackbird From: billy@MIX.COM Newsgroups: comp.sys.mac.system Subject: Re: Latest IOS/OS X SSL security flaw Date: Wed, 26 Feb 2014 06:42:58 +0000 (UTC) Organization: PANIX Public Access Internet and UNIX, NYC Lines: 17 Message-ID: References: NNTP-Posting-Host: panix5.panix.com X-Trace: reader2.panix.com 1393396978 3500 166.84.1.5 (26 Feb 2014 06:42:58 GMT) X-Complaints-To: abuse@panix.com NNTP-Posting-Date: Wed, 26 Feb 2014 06:42:58 +0000 (UTC) Xref: csiph.com comp.sys.mac.system:57313 Jolly Roger writes: > In my current position, I am often scanning lots of code in a very short > time span as I'm debugging, reviewing, or just reading code to gain an > understanding of it. The faster and easier it is for me to scan, the > better. Symmetry and spacing make a big difference in how fast you can > scan code. It's really that simple for me. The small amount of extra key > strokes needed is worth the gain in efficiency to me. Oddly enough, the same can be said regarding the masssive amounts of unnecessarily included text in some articles in this very thread. Billy Y.. -- sub #'9+1 ,r0 ; convert ascii byte add #9.+1 ,r0 ; to an integer bcc 20$ ; not a number