Path: csiph.com!v102.xanadu-bbs.net!xanadu-bbs.net!nntp.club.cc.cmu.edu!micro-heart-of-gold.mit.edu!bloom-beacon.mit.edu!panix!MIX!Blackbird From: billy@MIX.COM Newsgroups: comp.sys.mac.system Subject: Re: Is it OK/safe to put an entire news article in the subject... Date: Mon, 13 Jan 2014 15:36:16 +0000 (UTC) Organization: PANIX Public Access Internet and UNIX, NYC Lines: 16 Message-ID: References: <1oqdnf9Iu-cmEFTPnZ2dnUVZ_qidnZ2d@earthlink.com> <2014011113571021872-savageduck1@REMOVESPAMmecom> <110120142310229365%timstreater@greenbee.net> <2014011115124598603-savageduck1@REMOVESPAMmecom> NNTP-Posting-Host: panix5.panix.com X-Trace: reader2.panix.com 1389627376 22001 166.84.1.5 (13 Jan 2014 15:36:16 GMT) X-Complaints-To: abuse@panix.com NNTP-Posting-Date: Mon, 13 Jan 2014 15:36:16 +0000 (UTC) Xref: csiph.com comp.sys.mac.system:54700 Lewis writes: > Again, as I said previously, the csm* hierarchy gets few enough posts and > I have good enough filters that yes, I start at the first and read to > the end. If a thread I am reading gets especially dull, then I may mark > it read. But I'm still not paying the slightest attention to the > subjects. You're not alone - I know other people who don't look at subjects, too. There's nothing wrong with that, by the way... Billy Y.. -- sub #'9+1 ,r0 ; convert ascii byte add #9.+1 ,r0 ; to an integer bcc 20$ ; not a number