Path: csiph.com!v102.xanadu-bbs.net!xanadu-bbs.net!news.glorb.com!news-out.readnews.com!transit4.readnews.com!panix!MIX!Blackbird From: billy@MIX.COM Newsgroups: comp.sys.mac.system Subject: Re: Security Scare ? Date: Tue, 26 Nov 2013 03:01:59 +0000 (UTC) Organization: PANIX Public Access Internet and UNIX, NYC Lines: 18 Message-ID: References: NNTP-Posting-Host: panix5.panix.com X-Trace: reader2.panix.com 1385434919 11592 166.84.1.5 (26 Nov 2013 03:01:59 GMT) X-Complaints-To: abuse@panix.com NNTP-Posting-Date: Tue, 26 Nov 2013 03:01:59 +0000 (UTC) Xref: csiph.com comp.sys.mac.system:52673 Alan Browne writes: > There's no need for a perfect wave form at the mic, just a long enough > sample time (per bit period) to determine the tone f - and with a pretty > wide frequency tolerance to boot. All you need are good zero crossings. I work with this every day, in the form of SMPTE time code. There has been a massive amount of software written for this. Out of 80 bits per frame, 16 are used for a sync word, and the other 64 are data. At 30 frames/second (play speed for me), that's 240 bytes/second. Going much faster (as in shuttling tape), that's many more bytes/sec. Billy Y.. -- sub #'9+1 ,r0 ; convert ascii byte add #9.+1 ,r0 ; to an integer bcc 20$ ; not a number