Path: csiph.com!news.swapon.de!fu-berlin.de!uni-berlin.de!individual.net!not-for-mail From: Snit Newsgroups: comp.sys.mac.advocacy,comp.sys.mac.system Subject: Re: Explore the new system architectire of Apple Silicon Macs Date: 13 Jul 2020 21:45:47 GMT Lines: 55 Message-ID: References: <_qNOG.74558$NB.13477@fx20.iad> <130720201130040149%nospam@nospam.invalid> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit X-Trace: individual.net TbK4fQUmpWc5FzFgpPkH+gP7pVIb8bf9s7kyaG0nJZxRD31h3x Cancel-Lock: sha1:urzft5tIwzQnQKGYZ/6X6rVof1I= sha1:b+u6IWqMNP8r/aE46ldn+yq2N50= User-Agent: NewsTap/5.4.1 (iPhone/iPod Touch) Xref: csiph.com comp.sys.mac.advocacy:120130 comp.sys.mac.system:133488 Peter Köhlmann wrote: > JF Mezei wrote: > >> On 2020-07-13 11:30, nospam wrote: >> >>> of course they are going to do that. there's absolutely no reason not >>> to. >> >> Financial reason. Creating an ARM chip only for low volume MacPro with >> new interfaces to support external graphics, PCI express and likely >> others such as SATA, M.2 etc is a lot of work. >> >> If they need double the cores compared to a iMacPRO, that also requires >> a lot of work. >> >> There are ways to justify this work in terms of maintaining the >> development ecosystem. (at which point the MacPro becomes a cost centre). >> >> You dismiss the argument that designing a motherboard isn't a simple >> task, yet think that designing a chip for the MacPro is an easy task >> that Apple will do. >> >> Then again, you also argue that every single current model will see an >> upgrade to ARM model. >> >> Amazing that those who constantly insult me do not insult your arguments. > > nospam is absolutely immune to reason. He (and Snit Michael Glasser) are the > two "apple users" who will provide the very reason to send back any future > mac user back to windows. Apple users had (in the past) been touted as > "arrogant, stupid and condescending bastards immune to reason". There was > some truth to it, but it has lessened a lot in the last years. But those two > will serve happily to fuel that vision. nospam ist incredibly stupid, an > idiot who will tell everyone and his cat the "true gospel" of apple market > speech. He is completely devoid of any technical knowledge, and will answer > to ANY criticism to apple with "nonsense". He will fail EVERY time to tell > us why it should be "nonsense", because he is lacking the knowledge to do > so. And Snit? Well, he is Snit. He is the very person who is seen as the > "lying apple bastards" by the (not yet) apple users. And when those "not yet > apple users" see posts from these bullshit idiots, they will never be any > "apple user". Just to make certain that their environment will not blame > them > Have you figured out what “Quit” and “Exit” do on Linux yet? LOL! How about HTML 5? Figured out it is not just for Apple devices? Can’t believe you are still crying over how I noted your blunders. -- Personal attacks from those who troll show their own insecurity. They cannot use reason to show the message to be wrong so they try to feel somehow superior by attacking the messenger. They cling to their attacks and ignore the message time and time again.