Path: csiph.com!usenet.pasdenom.info!aioe.org!.POSTED!not-for-mail From: Doug Anderson Newsgroups: comp.sys.mac.system Subject: Re: Any quick, easy way to compare two images? Date: 26 Jan 2014 08:19:14 -0800 Organization: Rare Lines: 26 Message-ID: References: <2ridndio-M0kOnzPnZ2dnUVZ8kmdnZ2d@giganews.com> <2fd2jijlbb.fsf@ethel.the.log> <161tzyjibp.fsf@ethel.the.log> <5cKdnS2-vfr0cX_PnZ2dnUVZ_oSdnZ2d@giganews.com> <6jy523synp.fsf@ethel.the.log> <250120141345247892%nospam@nospam.invalid> <250120141630000472%nospam@nospam.invalid> <2014012515592033890-savageduck1@REMOVESPAMmecom> <2014012517510124273-savageduck1@REMOVESPAMmecom> NNTP-Posting-Host: VU74RkCEue2cZAa0sAHoDA.user.speranza.aioe.org Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii X-Complaints-To: abuse@aioe.org User-Agent: Emacs Gnus X-Notice: Filtered by postfilter v. 0.8.2 Xref: csiph.com comp.sys.mac.system:55432 Jolly Roger writes: (snip) > The reason we are still talking about this is you have not sufficiently > articulate what you want. But he has.. The reason we are still talking about it is that some people jumped to the wrong conclusion about what he wanted, and this being usenet, they won't let go no matter how clearly he articulates it. > In your OP, you seem to imply that this > network camera captures images of a scene at irregular intervals, and > that you have a collection of those images that you want to process to > eliminate captures of the scene that are not substantially > different. No, he didn't imply that. He specifically used the words "the same as." Not "look the same," not "similar to a human eye." The only way I can see for someone to be confused is if they read the subject line (which was a bit ambiguous) but not the post.. Of course _no one_ on USENET would ever do that!