Path: csiph.com!v102.xanadu-bbs.net!xanadu-bbs.net!feeder.erje.net!1.eu.feeder.erje.net!fu-berlin.de!uni-berlin.de!individual.net!not-for-mail
From: Jolly Roger <jollyroger@pobox.com>
Newsgroups: misc.phone.mobile.iphone,comp.mobile.ipad,comp.sys.mac.system
Subject: Re: What if these two men had formed a company together?
Date: 14 Jun 2015 14:26:12 GMT
Organization: People for the Ethical Treatment of Pirates
Lines: 30
Message-ID: <cu5h84Frql8U1@mid.individual.net>
References: <130620150704466708%michelle@michelle.org> <c9ydncJR89MUp-HInZ2dnUU7-KOdnZ2d@giganews.com> <130620150743436963%michelle@michelle.org> <alpine.OSX.2.20.1506131601160.43505@mako.ath.cx> <130620151509070477%michelle@michelle.org> <alpine.OSX.2.20.1506131828010.43505@mako.ath.cx> <130620152011507691%nospam@nospam.invalid> <0fWdnfkvxZeD6-DInZ2dnUU7-VmdnZ2d@giganews.com>
X-Trace: individual.net BEjV5fvRJmIIOZOln8+qygMy1HqOkgQONIitPVau0QqoIUkMNf
Cancel-Lock: sha1:PkG0mHypIUaFUG6kj2366fGVTCM=
X-Face: _.g>n!a$f3/H3jA]>9pN55*5<`}Tud57>1<n@LQ!aZ7vLO_nWbK~@T'XIS0,oAJcU.qLM dk/j8Udo?O"o9B9Jyx+ez2:B<nx(k3EdHnTvB]'eoVaR495,Rv~/vPa[e^JI+^h5Zk*i`Q;ezqDW< ZFs6kmAJWZjOH\8[$$7jm,Ogw3C_%QM'|H6nygNGhhl+@}n30Nz(^vWo@h>Y%b|b-Y~()~\t,LZ3e up1/bO{=-)
User-Agent: slrn/1.0.1 (Darwin)
Xref: csiph.com comp.mobile.ipad:48963 comp.sys.mac.system:76594

On 2015-06-14, Alan Browne <alan.browne@freelunchvideotron.ca> wrote:
> On 2015-06-13 20:11, nospam wrote:
>> In article <alpine.OSX.2.20.1506131828010.43505@mako.ath.cx>, David
>> Ritz <dritz@mindspring.com> wrote:
>>
>>>>> Michelle, you have Thoth set to automatically wrap text.
>>>
>>>> I just unchecked that.
>>>
>>> Great.  Now you'll have to remember to manually line wrap text,
>>> _before_ you hit send, as lines will no longer wrap automatically.
>>> Just make certain you're not wrapping things like long URLs or Usenet
>>> Path statements, if you want them to passed as long lines.
>>
>> that's worse.
>>
>> there is nothing wrong with wrapped urls. just put them in <> and apps
>> figure it out and strip embedded line breaks (if any).
>
> Not consistently with Thunderbird.  It often works, but there are cases 
> it seems not.

slrn has problems too, but it's not like fixing the URL manually is all
that hard. It could be better, but it's just not a big issue for me.

-- 
E-mail sent to this address may be devoured by my ravenous SPAM filter.
I often ignore posts from Google. Use a real news client instead.

JR