Path: csiph.com!v102.xanadu-bbs.net!xanadu-bbs.net!feeder.erje.net!1.eu.feeder.erje.net!news-1.dfn.de!news.dfn.de!fu-berlin.de!uni-berlin.de!individual.net!not-for-mail From: Jolly Roger Newsgroups: comp.sys.mac.system Subject: Re: OS X security tools - trivial to bypass? Date: 27 Apr 2015 16:34:15 GMT Organization: People for the Ethical Treatment of Pirates Lines: 27 Message-ID: References: X-Trace: individual.net JnvmLY0Tgukx6bphHXJY4ANv7hemifrm28Sv7Ou5ZLN3EEBt1m Cancel-Lock: sha1:P007UEFVsMBeoEsE3PbffBfeiYY= X-Face: _.g>n!a$f3/H3jA]>9pN55*5<`}Tud57>1Y%b|b-Y~()~\t,LZ3e up1/bO{=-) User-Agent: slrn/1.0.1 (Darwin) Xref: csiph.com comp.sys.mac.system:74341 On 2015-04-27, Alan Browne wrote: > On 2015-04-27 11:45, Jolly Roger wrote: >> >> My take: >> >> *yawn* > > That's too dismissive given the claims. The issue isn't the running of > arbitrary code but how that code can be loaded and executed because of > defects in the security system. > > Don't dismiss this too quickly. I'm not dismissing it, but it's certainly not anything to panic about either - hence the *yawn*. And what you call "defects" may be deliberate design choices, where Apple has implemented a base-level set of functionality with plans to add more functionality later on. I'm betting a few years from now, if we were to revisit this topic in depth, we'll find that Apple has done just that, which is not at all uncommon for Apple. -- E-mail sent to this address may be devoured by my ravenous SPAM filter. I often ignore posts from Google. Use a real news client instead. JR