Path: csiph.com!v102.xanadu-bbs.net!xanadu-bbs.net!feeder.erje.net!eu.feeder.erje.net!fu-berlin.de!uni-berlin.de!individual.net!not-for-mail From: Jolly Roger Newsgroups: comp.sys.mac.misc,comp.sys.mac.system Subject: Re: Rumour: 8K iMac coming?!? Date: 11 Apr 2015 19:27:49 GMT Organization: People for the Ethical Treatment of Pirates Lines: 23 Message-ID: References: <070420151334193213%YourName@YourISP.com> <070420152305222486%heron@invalid.invalid> <080420151817254185%YourName@YourISP.com> <5524dfe5$0$44539$c3e8da3$66d3cc2f@news.astraweb.com> <55253459$0$24990$c3e8da3$92d0a893@news.astraweb.com> <090420150911091493%YourName@YourISP.com> <55273648$0$20134$c3e8da3$1cbc7475@news.astraweb.com> <100420151813587916%YourName@YourISP.com> X-Trace: individual.net XeKTKzhyxRyWxyMKt4Gz1wSOVZFbDZ6yOEwqGHvM4anz5k+dNP Cancel-Lock: sha1:G9clW4Sp5Sj9ibCBkcDY/AbcGco= X-Face: _.g>n!a$f3/H3jA]>9pN55*5<`}Tud57>1Y%b|b-Y~()~\t,LZ3e up1/bO{=-) User-Agent: slrn/1.0.1 (Darwin) Xref: csiph.com comp.sys.mac.misc:4743 comp.sys.mac.system:73096 On 2015-04-11, John McWilliams wrote: > On 4/10/15 PDT 7:07 AM, Jolly Roger wrote: >> >> Despite your apparent love of hyperbole, there's nothing insidious going >> on here. The terms "LED display" and "CCFL display" are simply natural >> ways for us to distinguish between displays with different technologies >> used to light the panels. While nobody should throw away a working CCFL >> display just for the hell of it, LED back lights are actually better >> than florescent back lights in a few different ways. They have a much >> longer lifespan, consume less energy, and emit a more uniform brightness >> across the display, for instance. So if given the choice, I'll generally >> take an LED display over a CCFL display. >> > And I will stick with my plasma, thanks! I'd love an OLED UHD, but can't > justify dumping the plasma. Same here! Love my plasma! -- E-mail sent to this address may be devoured by my ravenous SPAM filter. I often ignore posts from Google. Use a real news client instead. JR